MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Yana Morderger vs Jesika Maleckova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: Morderger 0 - 3 Maleckova

They have played 8 sets in total, with Morderger winning 2 and Maleckova winning 6. The last match between Morderger and Maleckova was at the W75 Prague, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Jesika Maleckova getting the victory 7-5 6-0.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Yana Morderger 0
Jesika Maleckova 3

W75 Prague(16-02-2025)

Morderger vs Maleckova H2H Profile
Morderger Stats Maleckova
0% (0-6) YTD Win/Loss 50% (4-4)
0 Head-to-Head 3
869 Ranking 406
361 Highest Rank 191
28 Age 30
- Plays -
1 Titles 11
48% (281-301) Career Total W/L 59% (359-250)
$1,904 Career Prize Money $13,483
0 YTD Titles 0
0 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 1
0 Indoor H2H 2
0 Grass H2H 0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

28 Mar 2025 / Final

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Jessica Pegula

To Win

57.4 %
29.62%

Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami atp

29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Taylor Fritz

To Win

70.35 %
3.24%

Morderger VS Maleckova H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-5 6-0
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
60% ( 36 of 60)
1st Serve %
50% ( 31 of 62)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
86% ( 31 of 36)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
38% ( 9 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 30 of 62)
70
Total Points Won
52
2-6 6-2 7-5
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
49% ( 39 of 80)
1st Serve %
48% ( 45 of 93)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
13
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 29 of 45)
39% ( 16 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 18 of 48)
44% ( 7 of 16)
Break Points Won
67% ( 6 of 9)
44% ( 35 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 46 of 93)
91
Total Points Won
82
6-2 6-7(5) 6-0
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
64% ( 46 of 72)
1st Serve %
66% ( 52 of 79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61% ( 28 of 46)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 23 of 52)
73% ( 19 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
80% ( 8 of 10)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
35% ( 25 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 44 of 79)
91
Total Points Won
60

Morderger VS Maleckova H2H Stats

Morderger Vs Maleckova H2H Stats
Yana Morderger Morderger Stats Jesika Maleckova Maleckova
0 H2H Matches 3
2 Sets Won 6
27 Games Won 46
6 Aces (Total) 7
23 Total Double Faults 12
2:4:25 Average Match Time 2:4:25
55% (128/234) 1st Serve % 57% (121/212)
55% (70/128) 1st Serve Win % 73% (88/121)
42% (44/106) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (44/91)
56% (9/16) Break Points Won % (Total) 51% (19/37)
38% (80/212) Return Points Win % 51% (120/234)
0% (0/3) Best of 3 Sets Win % 100% (3/3)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/1)
0% (0/2) Deciding Set Win % 100% (2/2)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Won Match 100% (2/2)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (2/0)
0% (2/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 100% (1/1)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Yana Morderger vs Jesika Maleckova Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Yana Morderger 0 - 3 Jesika Maleckova

Insights on the Upcoming Tennis Match

  1. Prediction Accuracy and Second Serve Performance: Analyzing their recent form over the past six months, it is intriguing to note that Morderger has triumphed in 41.91% of points on their second serve, while Maleckova boasts a slightly higher success rate of 42.35%. Remarkably, there exists a substantial correlation between these statistics and the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. Return Game Stats and Their Significance: When scrutinizing their return game statistics, Morderger's recent form indicates a commendable performance in which they have won 52.9% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Maleckova has displayed even greater proficiency, winning an impressive 59.31% of these points. Additionally, the success rates for first serve returns stand at 32.35% and 40.23% for Morderger and Maleckova respectively. Undoubtedly, these figures hold considerable importance in determining the favored player in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
  3. Under Pressure Analysis: Evaluating their ability to handle pressure, it is worth noting that Morderger has successfully saved 51.03% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Maleckova has demonstrated an even greater prowess by saving 55.05%. This statistic proves to be invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
  4. Performance Overview: Considering their performances over the past year, Morderger has won 36.59% of the matches they have played, boasting a win/loss ratio of 15/26. Conversely, Maleckova has enjoyed a higher success rate, winning 58.7% of her matches with a win/loss ratio of 27/19. Taken together, these figures provide an overall prediction overview for their H2H encounter.
  5. Surface Preferences: Delving into their career statistics, it becomes apparent that Morderger excels on clay courts, conquering 49% of her matches (W/L 184/190). Conversely, her performance on indoor hard courts has been subpar, winning just 44% of matches (W/L 43/54). In contrast, Maleckova demonstrates a preference for hard courts, securing victories in an impressive 63% of matches (W/L 22/13). However, her performance on grass courts has been less fortunate, with a win percentage of 0% (W/L 0/3).
  6. Player Level and Event Comparison: In the past year, Morderger primarily participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize purses exceeding $10,000. During this period, she achieved success in 34.21% of her matches (W/L 13/25). Comparatively, Maleckova engaged in mostly similar tournaments, attaining triumph in 60.47% of matches (W/L 26/17). When predicting the favorite, one must consider the relative event level at which these players have competed.
  7. Head-to-Head Encounter: To date, Morderger and Maleckova have met two times, with Morderger failing to secure victory on either occasion, while Maleckova triumphed both times. Throughout these encounters, they fought in six sets, with Morderger winning two and Maleckova securing four. The most recent match transpired at the W75 Petange tournament on April 11, 2024, on an indoor hard court. In this thrilling battle, Jesika Maleckova emerged victorious with a scoreline of 2-6, 6-2, 7-5.
  8. Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Examining their previous meetings, it is apparent that the average match time between Morderger and Maleckova amounts to 2 hours, 16 minutes, and 0 seconds.
  9. Deciding Set Prediction: In the event of a deciding set, Morderger and Maleckova have encountered this scenario twice before. Morderger has failed to seize victory on either occasion, while Maleckova emerged triumphantly both times. This insight proves particularly useful when predicting the outcome of a match that extends to its maximum distance.
  10. Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Throughout their H2H encounters, Morderger and Maleckova have engaged in one decisive tiebreak, with Morderger prevailing in one instance and Maleckova emerging victoriously in another.
  11. Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past twelve months, Morderger has faced opponents with an average ranking of 370.37, while Maleckova has encountered players with an average ranking of 374.48.
  12. Deciding Set Performance against All Players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, valuable insights arise when considering the performance of Morderger and Maleckova in deciding sets. During the past year, Morderger has emerged victorious in 27% of her deciding sets, whereas Maleckova boasts a winning rate of 50% in all matches played on the tour.
  13. Current Event H2H Statistics: While past player performance provides a solid foundation for match predictions, it remains crucial to assess current event statistics to gauge the form of players during an ongoing event. To access this information for the current event, please refer to the section below (if applicable). Additionally, certain players exhibit enhanced performances at specific events, necessitating their consideration when predicting the outcome.
  14. Break Point Conversion Rates: Analyzing their recent form, it is evident that Morderger successfully converted 52.33% of breakpoints, whereas Maleckova achieved a conversion rate of 48.21% when presented with opportunities to break their opponent's serve. This statistic proves invaluable for in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
  15. If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Intended for statistical enthusiasts).

Yana Morderger Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Yana Morderger
56% ( 24 of 43)
1st Serve %
45% ( 18 of 40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63% ( 15 of 24)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
42% ( 8 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
18% ( 4 of 22)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
47% ( 20 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
68% ( 27 of 40)
50
Total Points Won
33
L
6-0 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Emeline Dartron
Player
Yana Morderger
59% ( 29 of 49)
1st Serve %
54% ( 55 of 101)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62% ( 18 of 29)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 30 of 55)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 20 of 46)
31% ( 5 of 16)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
35% ( 17 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 51 of 101)
83
Total Points Won
67
L
0-6 6-1 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Yana Morderger
60% ( 37 of 62)
1st Serve %
58% ( 38 of 65)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73% ( 27 of 37)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 21 of 38)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
35% ( 22 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 30 of 65)
70
Total Points Won
57
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
60% ( 36 of 60)
1st Serve %
50% ( 31 of 62)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
86% ( 31 of 36)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
38% ( 9 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 30 of 62)
70
Total Points Won
52
L
7-5 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Daria Kuczer
Player
Yana Morderger
60% ( 26 of 43)
1st Serve %
49% ( 23 of 47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73% ( 19 of 26)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
53% ( 9 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 8 of 24)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
35% ( 15 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 29 of 47)
57
Total Points Won
33
L
6-1 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Shuo Feng
Player
Yana Morderger
66% ( 44 of 67)
1st Serve %
61% ( 59 of 97)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
68% ( 30 of 44)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 33 of 59)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 14 of 38)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 3 of 3)
34% ( 23 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 50 of 97)
94
Total Points Won
70
L
3-6 6-0 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Salma Drugdova
Player
Yana Morderger
55% ( 35 of 64)
1st Serve %
54% ( 37 of 68)
6
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
66% ( 23 of 35)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 22 of 37)
31% ( 9 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
23% ( 7 of 31)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
50% ( 32 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 39 of 68)
71
Total Points Won
61
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Ekaterina Yashina
Player
Yana Morderger
71% ( 40 of 56)
1st Serve %
59% ( 42 of 71)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78% ( 31 of 40)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 27 of 42)
69% ( 11 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 14 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 27 of 71)
69
Total Points Won
58
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Anna Gabric
Player
Yana Morderger
73% ( 51 of 70)
1st Serve %
43% ( 32 of 74)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
13
59% ( 30 of 51)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 23 of 32)
42% ( 8 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
19% ( 8 of 42)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
63% ( 5 of 8)
46% ( 32 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 43 of 74)
81
Total Points Won
63
L
7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
49% ( 39 of 80)
1st Serve %
48% ( 45 of 93)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
13
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 29 of 45)
39% ( 16 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 18 of 48)
44% ( 7 of 16)
Break Points Won
67% ( 6 of 9)
44% ( 35 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 46 of 93)
91
Total Points Won
82
L
2-6 6-2 7-5 H2H

Jesika Maleckova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Sinja Kraus
Player
Jesika Maleckova
58% ( 23 of 40)
1st Serve %
60% ( 25 of 42)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78% ( 18 of 23)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
71% ( 12 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 6 of 17)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 10 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 25 of 42)
55
Total Points Won
27
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
61% ( 60 of 98)
1st Serve %
51% ( 61 of 120)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68% ( 41 of 60)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 36 of 61)
37% ( 14 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 31 of 59)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
50% ( 5 of 10)
44% ( 43 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 53 of 120)
108
Total Points Won
110
L
7-5 2-6 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Maria Timofeeva
41% ( 29 of 71)
1st Serve %
47% ( 23 of 49)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
72% ( 21 of 29)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 15 of 23)
48% ( 20 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
42% ( 30 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
64
Total Points Won
56
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
60% ( 36 of 60)
1st Serve %
50% ( 31 of 62)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
86% ( 31 of 36)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
38% ( 9 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 30 of 62)
70
Total Points Won
52
W
7-5 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
64% ( 41 of 64)
1st Serve %
49% ( 29 of 59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
35% ( 8 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
41% ( 26 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 32 of 59)
70
Total Points Won
53
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Nadiya Kolb
51% ( 31 of 61)
1st Serve %
62% ( 52 of 84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68% ( 21 of 31)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 28 of 52)
47% ( 14 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 12 of 32)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
43% ( 26 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 44 of 84)
79
Total Points Won
66
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Dalma Galfi
Player
Jesika Maleckova
67% ( 37 of 55)
1st Serve %
44% ( 20 of 45)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70% ( 26 of 37)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 13 of 20)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 18 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
60
Total Points Won
40
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Solymar Colling
57% ( 29 of 51)
1st Serve %
73% ( 43 of 59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
69% ( 20 of 29)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 22 of 43)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 6 of 16)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 18 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 31 of 59)
64
Total Points Won
46
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Anna Gabric
Player
Jesika Maleckova
76% ( 53 of 70)
1st Serve %
55% ( 35 of 64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
62% ( 33 of 53)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 21 of 35)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 9 of 29)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
41% ( 29 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 34 of 64)
75
Total Points Won
59
L
1-6 6-0 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
58% ( 45 of 77)
1st Serve %
60% ( 45 of 75)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
71% ( 32 of 45)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
47% ( 15 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 11 of 30)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
8% ( 1 of 12)
39% ( 30 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 36 of 75)
83
Total Points Won
69
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Morderger & Maleckova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Yana Morderger Morderger Stats Jesika Maleckova Maleckova
48% (281/301) Win/Loss 59% (359/250)
50% (659/660) Sets Win/Loss 58% (786/580)
52% (6140/5757) Games Win/Loss 54% (6621/5623)
46% (23/27) Hard Win/Loss 63% (22/13)
49% (184/190) Clay Win/Loss 60% (243/162)
47% (74/84) Indoor Hard W/L 57% (94/72)
0% (0/0) Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/3)
0.08 Aces Per Game 0.16
480 Aces Total 975
0.28 Double Faults Per Game 0.22
1647 Total Double Faults 1306
1:5:51 Average Match Time 1:6:45
515.08 Average Opponent Rank 530.39
52% (12703/24298) 1st Serve % 55% (14686/26695)
62% (7858/12703) 1st Serve Win % 63% (9294/14686)
43% (4946/11601) 2nd Serve Win % 46% (5507/12009)
50% (1560/3119) Break Points Won % (Total) 50% (1782/3532)
48% (11256/23600) Return Points Win % 47% (12802/27177)
0% (0/0) Slam W/L 0% (0/6)
0% (0/0) Masters W/L 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Cups W/L 0% (0/0)
20% (2/8) Main Tour W/L 32% (12/25)
0% (0/0) Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0)
46% (152/176) Challenger W/L 58% (256/184)
52% (127/117) Futures W/L 72% (91/35)
48% (275/571) Best of 3 Sets Win % 60% (352/591)
50% (2/4) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/2)
41% (42/103) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 47% (46/97)
37% (59/158) Deciding Set Win % 55% (92/166)
81% (301/245) 1st Set Won, Won Match 88% (343/302)
19% (301/56) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 12% (343/41)
12% (281/33) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 21% (262/55)

See recent tennis photos of Morderger and Maleckova

Other Predictions

Puerto Vallarta Open - Puerto Vallarta

flag
flag
Prediction

Megasaray Hotels Open 2 - Antalya

flag
28 Mar
flag
12:00
Prediction
  • Loading news...