Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yana Morderger vs Emily Welker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Morderger vs Welker analysis and find out who is favored!
Yana Morderger vs Emily Welker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Morderger has won 43.54% of points on his second serve, while Welker has won 45.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Morderger, in recent form, has won 56.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Welker has won 57.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.75% and 41.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Morderger has saved 44.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Welker has saved 46.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Morderger has won 40.43% of matches played (W/L 19/ 28), with Welker winning 54.76% (W/L 23/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Morderger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 175/ 180), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 22/ 25). Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 38/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Morderger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.22% of matches (W/L 19/ 26), where as Welker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Morderger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Morderger winning 2 and Welker winning 0. The last match between Morderger and Welker was at the W25+H Leipzig, 12-08-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Yana Morderger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Morderger and Welker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Morderger winning 0 times and Welker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Morderger winning 0, and Welker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Morderger has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.55 while Welker has played against players with an average rank of 178.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Morderger has won 18% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Welker has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Morderger has converted 45.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Welker has converted 44.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Morderger 1 - 0 Welker
669
Rank
361
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
766
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
49% (269-275)
Career Total W/L
54% (111-94)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$1,904
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yana Morderger | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (28/61) | 54% (20/37) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 50% (10/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (18/33) | 24% (4/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (23/37) | 36% (22/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Yana Morderger
Player
Emily Welker
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yana Morderger | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (17/17) | 33% (1/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (156/158) | 43% (13/17) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:38 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 223.21 | 810 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (607/1058) | 66% (67/101) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (382/607) | 46% (31/67) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (204/451) | 35% (12/34) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (54/113) | 41% (7/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (453/1032) | 48% (54/112) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Yana Morderger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Iva Primorac
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Denise Hrdinkova
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
85)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noelia Manta
Player
Yana Morderger
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Helena Muzinic
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
2 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Yana Morderger
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Yana Morderger
56%
(
63 of
113)
1st Serve %
50%
(
48 of
96)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
34%
(
17 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(5) 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Yana Morderger
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Viktoria Morvayova
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Freya Christie
Player
Yana Morderger
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Emily Welker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Selina Dal
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
11
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Luise Reisel
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Amelie Smejkalova
75%
(
75 of
100)
1st Serve %
78%
(
76 of
97)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Marija Semenistaja
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Emily Welker
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Morderger Vs Welker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yana Morderger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
