Y. Bai
To Win
A. Wang
To Win
Yan Bai vs Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L L W W L
Form
W L L W L L W L W WHead To Head: Bai 0 - 1 Kjaer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bai winning 0 and Kjaer winning 2. The last match between Bai and Kjaer was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Nicolai Budkov Kjaer getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yan Bai | 0 |
| Nicolai Budkov Kjaer | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Yan Bai
7
6
6
2
| Bai | Stats | Kjaer |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (29-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (20-16) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 253 | Ranking | 303 |
| 200 | Highest Rank | 287 |
| 36 | Age | 18 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 29 | Titles | 3 |
| 65% (442-236) | Career Total W/L | 61% (46-29) |
| $53,505 | Career Prize Money | $41,500 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Yan Bai
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:48:0 | Average Match Time | 1:48:0 |
| 49% (33/68) | 1st Serve % | 52% (42/81) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (29/42) |
| 37% (13/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 27% (3/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 83% (5/6) |
| 42% (34/81) | Return Points Win % | 50% (34/68) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bai vs Kjaer Match Preview :
- How do their second-serve performances compare? Recently, Kjaer has a 43.02% success rate, slightly trailing Bai at 43.72%.
- On returning second serves, Bai holds a slight edge with 44.4% compared to Kjaer's 43.24%.
- Who has better first serve return stats? Kjaer leads marginally with 28.28%, ahead of Bai's 27.42%.
- Under pressure, Kjaer has saved 52.46% of breakpoints, closely matched by Bai's 52.15%.
- Over the past year, Kjaer boasts a win rate of 55.77%, while Bai stands out with 71.23%.
- Both players favor indoor hard courts: Kjaer wins 68% of matches, Bai follows closely at 66%.
- Kjaer is more accustomed to higher-level events, whereas Bai excels in lower-tier tournaments with an impressive 85.71% win rate.
- In terms of opponent quality, Kjaer faces tougher competitors, averaging against rank 322.4, compared to Bai's 388.96.
- Both win 56% of deciding sets, indicating equal resilience in tight matches.
- Current event form can shift dynamics, so closely observing their performances can provide further insights.
- Bai narrowly outperformed Kjaer in breakpoint conversion, managing 35.37% to Kjaer's 34.67%.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming match, Bai's overall superior win percentage over the past year immediately stands out. This suggests an inherent consistency that offers them a slight edge.
Despite Kjaer facing tougher opposition on average, Bai's excellent win rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments speaks volumes about their dominance at this level.
Second serve and return statistics play a crucial role in match outcomes. Here, Bai has shown a marginal advantage that could be pivotal in crucial points.
On indoor hard courts, both players display similar proficiency, adding an intriguing balance to the match's dynamics.
Given these evaluations, Bai is the likely favorite to emerge victorious based on current form and overall performance metrics.
Bai vs Kjaer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Yan Bai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yaojie Zeng
Player
Yan Bai
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
110)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Aoran Wang
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
89)
7
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
10
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
32 of
74)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Yan Bai
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Yan Bai
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Chen Dong
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Jack Bruce-Smith
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Yan Bai
84%
(
92 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
49%
(
54 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
56 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Amit Vales
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Lorenzo Lorusso
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Yan Bai
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Bondioli
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Massimo Giunta
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (442/236) | Win/Loss | 61% (46/29) |
| 64% (950/537) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (102/70) |
| 56% (7481/5980) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (863/763) |
| 66% (360/186) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 63% (56/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (24/15) |
| 64% (23/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) |
| 43% (3/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1493 | Aces Total | 206 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 881 | Total Double Faults | 166 |
| 1:3:4 | Average Match Time | 1:34:22 |
| 543.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 372.68 |
| 60% (17181/28424) | 1st Serve % | 61% (2868/4674) |
| 68% (11747/17181) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1911/2868) |
| 51% (5723/11243) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (943/1806) |
| 45% (1524/3410) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (225/486) |
| 43% (12737/29524) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1949/4658) |
| 25% (2/6) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 25% (2/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 25% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (98/97) | Challenger W/L | 57% (17/13) |
| 74% (336/117) | Futures W/L | 74% (26/9) |
| 67% (431/642) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (46/74) |
| 27% (3/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (83/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (12/20) |
| 57% (85/150) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 91% (431/391) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (41/38) |
| 9% (431/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (41/3) |
| 22% (243/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (34/8) |
Bai vs. Kjaer Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
