S. Kwon
To Win
D. Lee
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W LForm
L L W L W L L L W WThey have played 6 sets in total, with Bai winning 4 and Lee winning 2. The last match between Bai and Lee was at the Gwangju Challenger, 20-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Yan Bai getting the victory 6-3 7-6(7).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Yan Bai | 2 |
Duckhee Lee | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(20-04-2025)
Bai | Stats | Lee |
---|---|---|
75% (21-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (6-8) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
216 | Ranking | 881 |
200 | Highest Rank | 130 |
36 | Age | 26 |
R | Plays | R |
29 | Titles | 13 |
65% (434-232) | Career Total W/L | 57% (346-263) |
$53,505 | Career Prize Money | $104,150 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
2 | Hard H2H | 2 |
23 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
23 May 2025 / Q3
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(7) |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Duckhee Lee
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
w/o | |||||
6-2 ret. | |||||
6-4 6-1 | |||||
4-1 ret. |
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 2 |
28 | Games Won | 24 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
0:29:24 | Average Match Time | 0:29:24 |
62% (51/82) | 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) |
67% (34/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (27/42) |
48% (15/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
44% (29/66) | Return Points Win % | 40% (33/82) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hold onto your tennis caps, folks! Lee and Bai are about to clash rackets, and their recent performances bring plenty of data to set the stage. Now, let's dive into these stats with a hearty dose of wit! When it comes to second serves, Lee is winning 39.95% of the points, while Bai is ahead with 44.05%. It's like a high-stakes poker game where a good second serve is your ace in the hole. And that's not all—Bai just pips ahead in first serve returns too, managing a 26.77% success rate, while Lee is making waves with a lofty 33.07%.
Bai seems to have mastered the art of Houdini-style escapes, saving 50.91% of breakpoints under pressure, compared to Lee’s valiant but lower 43.62%. If you're betting on who’ll mind their P's and Q's under stress, Bai's your player. But there's more to tennis than just surviving tension! In head-to-head matches, Lee hasn't quite cracked the Bai code, with zero wins out of three encounters. However, both have split the sets evenly—like two kids tussling over the last cookie. Their last intense showdown was at the China F10 in July 2016, where Lee’s entry came with a deceptive victory marked ‘w/o’, perhaps reminding us that even in tennis, life sometimes offers unexpected gifts.
Performance over the long run paints quite the picture. Over the past year, Bai’s been traversing the courts like a seasoned globetrotter, amassing a 70.27% win rate compared to Lee’s 48.48%, who is gallantly holding the fort nonetheless. Yet, looking at their win percentages on different surfaces gives us a chuckle: Lee's perfect 0% win on grass must leave their fans hopping in hope anytime they step onto a green court.
Should this match get to the nail-biting pinnacle of a deciding set, Bai's been flexing those mental muscles, winning 60% of the time over the last year, whereas Lee might need a little more pixie dust in winning just 29% of those critical moments. Ah, the notions of breakthrough and break serve: with Lee showing a knack for converting 48.86% of opportunities, you might just bet your apple pie on them grabbing those chances early.
When all is totaled up on this stat salad, Bai edges out as the anticipated victor. Their overall form, higher tournament level experience, and performance under pressure likely have Lee in a critique loop, searching for that elusive grand slam of answers before the first ball is served. So, grab your popcorn and stay tuned—tennis gods and unpredictable humans alike are about to serve an absolute treat!
Bai vs Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Yan Bai
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Yaojie Zeng
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Zhan Zheng
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Sanhui Shin
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Jacob Brumm
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Mikalai Haliak
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Duckhee Lee
Player
Uisung Park
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Duckhee Lee
Player
Donghyun Hwang
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
24 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Xing Dao Chen
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yan Bai
Player
Duckhee Lee
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ilia Simakin
Player
Duckhee Lee
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Duckhee Lee
Player
Kaichi Uchida
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Duckhee Lee
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Duckhee Lee
Player
Renta Tokuda
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
65% (434/232) | Win/Loss | 57% (346/263) |
64% (931/529) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (778/604) |
56% (7336/5878) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6671/6008) |
66% (354/184) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (301/205) |
63% (56/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (27/32) |
64% (21/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (18/22) |
50% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
1439 | Aces Total | 1097 |
0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
845 | Total Double Faults | 1613 |
1:2:1 | Average Match Time | 1:15:22 |
547.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 583.97 |
60% (16726/27669) | 1st Serve % | 61% (19921/32511) |
68% (11412/16726) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (13093/19921) |
51% (5575/10943) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6155/12590) |
45% (1476/3288) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1569/3408) |
43% (12330/28633) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13516/32398) |
29% (2/5) | Slam W/L | 43% (9/12) |
25% (2/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
25% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 30% (3/7) |
50% (98/97) | Challenger W/L | 47% (126/140) |
74% (328/114) | Futures W/L | 67% (206/102) |
67% (423/630) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (332/582) |
27% (3/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (3/11) |
53% (83/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (82/154) |
58% (85/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (82/169) |
91% (422/383) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (371/308) |
9% (422/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (371/62) |
22% (240/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (236/37) |