Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yan Bai vs Calvin Hemery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bai vs analysis and find out who is favored!
Yan Bai vs Calvin Hemery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bai has won 50.68% of points on his second serve, while has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bai, in recent form, has won 53.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.7% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bai has saved 54.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bai has won 74.67% of matches played (W/L 56/ 19), with winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bai has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 310/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Bai has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.63% of matches (W/L 40/ 9), where as has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bai has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.91 while has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bai has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bai has converted 42.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bai 0 - 0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bai VS H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yan Bai | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (11/5) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (24/13) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (182/152) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 48 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 82.13 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (652/991) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (422/652) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (173/339) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (58/132) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (495/1111) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 69% (9/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (11/16) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 1st Match |
Yan Bai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Yan Bai
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Kasidit Samrej
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Jimmy Yang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Ryotaro Taguchi
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Linang Xiao
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Shunsuke Nakagawa
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Yan Bai
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Yan Bai
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
10
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alexander Ritschard
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
41%
(
54 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
9
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Calvin Hemery
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Calvin Hemery
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bai Vs Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
