Prediction of Ya-Yi Yang [751st] vs Natalie Barbir [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L L W L L
Form
W L L L W L L L L LHead-2-Head: Yang 1 - 0 Barbir
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yang winning 2 and Barbir winning 0. The last match between Yang and Barbir was at the W35 Launceston, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Ya-Yi Yang getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ya-Yi Yang | 1 |
| Natalie Barbir | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ya-Yi Yang vs Natalie Barbir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Yang 1 - 0 Barbir
Editorial Prediction:
Ya-Yi Yang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Jiayi Wang
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
117)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuhan Wang
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kira Pavlova
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
117)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
48 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
117)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Yi Yang
Player
Yiming Dang
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
29 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ya-Yi Yang
Player
Cara Korhonen
71%
(
67 of
94)
1st Serve %
79%
(
64 of
81)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(7) 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Natalie Barbir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nana Kawagishi
Player
Natalie Barbir
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Natalie Barbir
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kanako Osafune
Player
Natalie Barbir
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-1 13-11 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandra Osborne
Player
Natalie Barbir
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Natalie Barbir
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
2 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gloria Ceschi
Player
Natalie Barbir
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Barbir
Player
Stella Knez
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
84)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
18
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
52%
(
42 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (121/83) | Win/Loss | 21% (38/140) |
| 58% (269/191) | Sets Win/Loss | 25% (95/290) |
| 53% (2220/1936) | Games Win/Loss | 37% (1240/2072) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 356 | Aces Total | 38 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 589 | Total Double Faults | 162 |
| 1:28:57 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 413.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 322.15 |
| 65% (7590/11748) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1469/2393) |
| 61% (4621/7590) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (729/1469) |
| 44% (1848/4158) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (316/924) |
| 50% (783/1567) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (89/210) |
| 47% (5608/11810) | Return Points Win % | 39% (861/2229) |
| 59% (120/202) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (35/174) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (18/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (12/22) |
| 46% (25/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 28% (9/32) |
| 86% (122/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (41/32) |
| 14% (122/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (41/9) |
| 18% (82/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (137/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
