Prediction of Xinyu Wang [41st] vs Mayar Sherif [61st] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L W W L L
Form
L W L W L W W W W WHead To Head: Wang 2 - 1 Sherif
They have played 7 sets in total, with Wang winning 5 and Sherif winning 2. The last match between Wang and Sherif was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 05-03-2025, First, Hard with Xinyu Wang getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Xinyu Wang | 2 |
| Mayar Sherif | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Xinyu Wang
Player
Mayar Sherif
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
85%
(
68 of
80)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Mayar Sherif
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Xinyu Wang
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
51 of
67)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
39 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 41 | Games Won | 31 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:59:59 | Average Match Time | 1:59:59 |
| 60% (145/242) | 1st Serve % | 74% (174/235) |
| 76% (110/145) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (107/174) |
| 43% (42/97) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (33/61) |
| 61% (11/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (6/20) |
| 40% (95/235) | Return Points Win % | 37% (90/242) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Xinyu Wang vs Mayar Sherif Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wang 2 - 1 Sherif
Editorial Prediction:
When evaluating their second serve performance over the last six months, Wang has excelled, securing 43.88% of points compared to Sherif's 37.47%. This indicator often aligns closely with match prediction outcomes. In addition, Wang has demonstrated strength in returning games, claiming 49.74% of points from opponents' second serves, while Sherif has a slightly better rate at 50.56%. For first serve returns, Sherif leads with 36.36% compared to Wang's 29.24%, lending insight into who might have the edge in their upcoming encounter.
Analyzing under-pressure scenarios, Wang has effectively saved 52.74% of breakpoints, whereas Sherif's figure stands at 51.13%, valuable metrics for predicting critical moments during matches. Over the past year, Wang has won 54.72% of matches played, while Sherif has a higher success rate at 58.06%. This head-to-head overview provides a snapshot of their recent form. Surface preferences come into play as Wang excels on indoor hard courts, boasting a 70% win rate, whereas Sherif shines on clay with a 74% win percentage. Conversely, Sherif's performance falters on indoor hard courts (25% win rate), and Wang's challenging surface is clay (53% win rate).
In terms of tour-level experience, Wang participated predominantly in Main Tour events last year, achieving a balanced win-loss record of 50%. Sherif, however, primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a considerable 77.14% win rate. The event level they appear at influences their comparative stats and can be critical in determining the favored player. Within direct head-to-head encounters, both players have claimed one victory each in their two matches. Notably, Wang secured the latest triumph at the Thailand Open with a decisive 6-2, 6-4 victory, reflecting Wang's potential advantage in this matchup.
Delving deeper into their deciding set performance over the last 12 months, Wang has won 63% of such sets in contrast to Sherif's 43%, highlighting Wang's proficiency in crucial match-deciding moments. Conversely, when the tension escalates to extreme pressure situations, such as tiebreaks, Sherif has an edge, having won their sole tiebreak encounter. The quality of opponents also differs, with Wang facing stronger competition with an average opponent rank of 85.38, compared to Sherif's 142.87.
Based on these comprehensive statistics and patterns, while Sherif has better clay court stats, the hard court surface may favor Wang. When accounting for their recent head-to-head performance and Wang's aptitude for handling deciding sets, the statistics suggest that Wang might have the upper hand and could likely emerge victorious in this matchup.
Xinyu Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Xinyu Wang
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Xinyu Wang
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Mayar Sherif
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
85%
(
68 of
80)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Xinyu Wang
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Xinyu Wang
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
85 of
132)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
61 of
132)
117
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(3) 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Xinyu Wang
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jil Teichmann
68%
(
94 of
138)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
61 of
87)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
47 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
126)
136
Total Points Won
128
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Maya Joint
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
80%
(
45 of
56)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Rebecca Marino
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
3
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mayar Sherif Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Renata Zarazua
88%
(
58 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Chloe Paquet
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Maria Timofeeva
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Caroline Werner
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Verena Meliss
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Mayar Sherif
55%
(
77 of
140)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
48%
(
67 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
122
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Joelle Steur
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Mayar Sherif
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Lulu Sun
76%
(
83 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Mayar Sherif
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
85%
(
68 of
80)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (238/165) | Win/Loss | 64% (285/157) |
| 57% (538/402) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (631/376) |
| 53% (4664/4073) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5074/4170) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1136 | Aces Total | 781 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1505 | Total Double Faults | 537 |
| 1:30:25 | Average Match Time | 1:28:27 |
| 342.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.38 |
| 57% (15009/26314) | 1st Serve % | 72% (17852/24827) |
| 66% (9917/15009) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11267/17852) |
| 47% (5279/11302) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3448/6974) |
| 46% (1531/3297) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1434/3147) |
| 45% (12088/27042) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11343/25288) |
| 60% (234/393) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (281/435) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (47/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 66% (67/101) |
| 55% (76/138) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (64/128) |
| 87% (229/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (289/252) |
| 12% (229/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (289/37) |
| 22% (174/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (153/32) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Xinyu Wang
View full predicted draw for Wang in Madrid
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mayar Sherif
View full predicted draw for Sherif in Madrid
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
