Xinyu Gao vs Jesika Maleckova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W L L L
Form
W W L W L W L W W LHead-to-head: Gao 2 - 0 Maleckova
They have played 5 sets in total, with Gao winning 4 and Maleckova winning 1. The last match between Gao and Maleckova was at the W75 Prague, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Xinyu Gao getting the victory 7-5 2-6 7-5.
W75 Prague(18-02-2025)
7
5
2
6
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Kvitova VS Kenin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 2-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
120)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats
2
H2H Matches
0
4
Sets Won
1
28
Games Won
21
7
Aces (Total)
6
8
Total Double Faults
16
2:12:4
Average Match Time
2:12:4
62% (101/162)
1st Serve %
50% (90/179)
70% (71/101)
1st Serve Win %
56% (50/90)
36% (22/61)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (44/89)
45% (10/22)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (7/17)
47% (85/179)
Return Points Win %
43% (69/162)
100% (2/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Xinyu Gao vs Jesika Maleckova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Xinyu Gao 2 - 0 Jesika Maleckova
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Gao has demonstrated outstanding skills on their second serve, winning 50.06% of points. In comparison, Maleckova has a slightly lower success rate of 42.59%. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Examination of Return Game Statistics: Recent return game data reveals that Gao has excelled in winning 56.74% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Maleckova has achieved a commendable success rate of 58.82%. These figures are equally notable when considering the first serve return percentages, standing at 41.49% for Gao and 40.1% for Maleckova. These statistics hold great significance in determining the favored player in their head-to-head encounter.
Under Pressure Assessment: Assessing their ability to handle pressure, Gao has displayed resilience by saving 55.83% of breakpoints in recent matches. Similarly, Maleckova has proven herself with a slightly higher save rate of 55.93%. These numbers hold immense value for making in-game betting predictions.
Overall Performance Overview: Taking into account the past year, Gao has emerged victorious in 68.25% of the matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 43 wins and 20 losses. In comparison, Maleckova has attained a success rate of 60.42%, winning 29 matches out of 19. This overview provides valuable insights into their head-to-head prediction.
Analysis of Preferred Surfaces: Examining their performance on various surfaces, Gao has a remarkable career win percentage of 69% on Clay (33 wins and 15 losses). However, their accomplishments on Grass are less commendable, with a win percentage of 0% (0 wins and 1 loss). Conversely, Maleckova excels on Hard courts, achieving a career win percentage of 63% (22 wins and 13 losses), while struggling on Grass with a win percentage of 0% (0 wins and 3 losses).
Evaluation of Player Level: In the past year, Gao has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, securing victory in a notable 77.27% of their matches (34 wins and 10 losses). Comparatively, Maleckova has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments surpassing $10K, achieving success in 62.22% of matches played (28 wins and 17 losses). When predicting the favored player based on statistics, it is essential to consider their respective event levels.
Head-to-Head Matches: Previous encounters between these players have occurred once, resulting in Gao's victory in all instances and Maleckova failing to secure a win. In the two sets played, Gao emerged triumphant on both occasions. Their most recent match took place at the W50 Porto on January 29, 2025, on Indoor hard courts, with Xinyu Gao emerging victorious with a score of 6-1, 6-4.
Average Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Historically, matches between these players have lasted an average of 1 hour, 26 minutes, and 24 seconds.
Prediction for Deciding Sets: Gao and Maleckova have yet to compete in a deciding set against each other. Nonetheless, this information can prove invaluable in predicting the outcome if the match extends to a final set.
Analysis of Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: In their previous encounters, Gao and Maleckova have not engaged in any tiebreaks, with neither player securing a victory in such situations.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past year, Gao has faced opponents ranked at an average of 249.54, while Maleckova has taken on players with an average rank of 382.81.
Deciding Set Performance versus All Players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that in the past year, Gao has triumphed in 57% of deciding sets, while Maleckova has achieved success in 50% of matches played on the professional tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical player performance provides valuable insights into match predictions, it is crucial to also consider current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. For updated information regarding their performance in the ongoing event, please refer to the section below (if applicable). Additionally, certain players may excel in specific tournaments, and this should be taken into account when determining the match outcome.
Break Point Conversion: Recent records indicate that Gao has converted 48.54% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Maleckova has capitalized on 47.73% of chances to break their opponents' serve. These figures hold tremendous significance for in-game live betting tips, particularly when a player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in utilizing models that predict tennis matches, we recommend referring to this informative article. However, please note that it may be more suitable for avid statisticians.
Xinyu Gao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Xinyu Gao
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
120)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Xinyu Gao
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Amandine Hesse
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Renata Jamrichova
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Nadiya Kolb
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
49 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyra Caterina Grant
Player
Xinyu Gao
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesika Maleckova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
120)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Maria Timofeeva
41%
(
29 of
71)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Jesika Maleckova
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Nadiya Kolb
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Jesika Maleckova
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Solymar Colling
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Jesika Maleckova
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yana Morderger
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
13
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
62% (254/155)
Win/Loss
59% (359/249)
60% (561/380)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (786/578)
54% (4557/3933)
Games Win/Loss
54% (6617/5611)
62% (206/126)
Hard Win/Loss
63% (22/13)
69% (33/15)
Clay Win/Loss
60% (243/161)
54% (15/13)
Indoor Hard W/L
57% (94/72)
0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/3)
0.14
Aces Per Game
0.16
573
Aces Total
970
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
893
Total Double Faults
1303
1:17:18
Average Match Time
1:6:47
470.72
Average Opponent Rank
530.99
63% (12986/20622)
1st Serve %
55% (14661/26653)
60% (7818/12986)
1st Serve Win %
63% (9283/14661)
46% (3527/7636)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (5501/11992)
48% (1303/2719)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (1781/3531)
47% (9593/20429)
Return Points Win %
47% (12792/27137)
29% (2/5)
Slam W/L
0% (0/6)
17% (1/5)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
43% (10/13)
Main Tour W/L
32% (12/25)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (195/115)
Challenger W/L
58% (256/183)
73% (46/17)
Futures W/L
72% (91/35)
62% (248/398)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (352/590)
67% (2/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
57% (42/74)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
47% (46/97)
56% (72/128)
Deciding Set Win %
55% (92/166)
88% (250/219)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (343/302)
12% (250/30)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (343/41)
21% (159/34)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (261/55)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
