William Ma vs Tomislav Edward Papac Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ma vs Papac analysis and find out who is favored!
William Ma vs Tomislav Edward Papac Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ma has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Papac has won 49.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ma, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Papac has won 49.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ma has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Papac has saved 56.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ma has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Papac winning 50% (W/L 16/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ma has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 61). Papac has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 15/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 28/ 46).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Ma winning 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Ma winning 6 and Papac winning 1. The last match between Ma and Papac was at the M25 Geelong, 10-03-2020, Q3, Grass with William Ma getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ma and Papac have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ma winning 1 times and Papac 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ma winning 0, and Papac 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ma has played against opponents with an average rank of while Papac has played against players with an average rank of 95.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ma has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Papac has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ma has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Papac has converted 26.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ma 3 - 0 Papac
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
2
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
44% (80-103)
Career Total W/L
43% (104-136)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | William Ma | Tomislav Edward Papac |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
Games Won | 38 | 21 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 0:28:0 | 0:28:0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (37/61) | 67% (36/54) |
1st Serve Win% | 86% (32/37) | 53% (19/36) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (9/24) | 33% (6/18) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/5) |
Return Points W% | 54% (29/54) | 33% (20/61) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-1 |
William Ma
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
6-4 2-6 6-1 | |||||
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | William Ma | Tomislav Edward Papac |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (10/12) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (100/117) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.23 |
Aces Total | 0 | 24 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
DFs Total | 0 | 26 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 148.7 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (248/409) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (173/248) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (72/161) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 29% (10/35) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (127/385) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
William Ma Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Markus Eriksson
Player
William Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
David Quayle
Player
William Ma
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
William Ma
Player
Filipe Paredes
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hillel Rousseau
Player
William Ma
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
William Ma
Player
Adria Vallejo Ferrer
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
82%
(
31 of
38)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Tomislav Edward Papac Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Luke Saville
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomislav Edward Papac
Player
Joshua Charlton
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve %
72%
(
13 of
18)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
15
Total Points Won
12
|
3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
73%
(
72 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
124)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
29 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomislav Edward Papac
Player
Sanhui Shin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tomislav Edward Papac
Player
Jay Fairclough
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Blake Mott
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Brandon Walkin
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more