William Ma vs Connor DI Marco Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ma vs Marco analysis and find out who is favored!
William Ma vs Connor DI Marco Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ma has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Marco has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ma, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marco has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ma has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marco has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ma has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Marco winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ma has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 61). Marco has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ma has played against opponents with an average rank of while Marco has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ma has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marco has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ma has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marco has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ma 0 - 0 Marco
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | William Ma | Connor DI Marco |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
William Ma Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Markus Eriksson
Player
William Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
David Quayle
Player
William Ma
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
William Ma
Player
Filipe Paredes
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hillel Rousseau
Player
William Ma
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
William Ma
Player
Adria Vallejo Ferrer
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
82%
(
31 of
38)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Connor DI Marco Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 4-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more