William Jucha vs David Poljak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W W L W L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Jucha 1 - 0 Poljak
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jucha winning 2 and Poljak winning 1. The last match between Jucha and Poljak was at the M25 Creteil, 09-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: I.hard, with William Jucha getting the victory 3-6 6-4 10-7.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| William Jucha | 1 |
| David Poljak | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Creteil(09-03-2025)
William Jucha
David Poljak
3
6
6
4
10
7
| Jucha | Stats | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (8-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (21-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 896 |
| Highest Rank | 370 | |
| 21 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 6 |
| 51% (40-39) | Career Total W/L | 55% (342-278) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Brancaccio VS Erjavec PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Reales VS Wang PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 10-7 |
Stats 
William Jucha
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
18 of
24)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 17 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:47:36 | Average Match Time | 0:47:36 |
| 65% (31/48) | 1st Serve % | 75% (18/24) |
| 68% (21/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 89% (16/18) |
| 29% (5/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 17% (4/24) | Return Points Win % | 46% (22/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jucha vs Poljak Match Preview :
In the context of second serve performance over the past six months, Poljak has consistently won 41.45% of points, while Jucha has managed to secure 40%. This difference is crucial as second serve performance is a significant indicator for predicting match outcomes.
Looking at the return game statistics, Poljak has won 42.51% of the points on their opponent's second serve in recent form, compared to Jucha, who has secured 42.05% in this category. Meanwhile, for first serve returns, Poljak has a success rate of 25.05%, slightly edging out Jucha's 24.84%. These statistics are instrumental in predicting the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Poljak has shown resilience by saving 59.29% of breakpoints recently, whereas Jucha has saved 56.67%. This metric is particularly valuable when considering in-game betting predictions. Furthermore, in terms of break point conversion, Poljak has been effective 38.95% of the time, whereas Jucha has only converted 8.33% of opportunities.
Over the last year, Poljak has demonstrated a winning rate of 57.69% in matches played, delivering a record of 30 wins out of 52 matches. On the other hand, Jucha has maintained a 50% winning rate, resulting in a balanced win-loss record of 9 to 9. This performance difference offers an insight into their head-to-head prediction overview.
Analyzing career surfaces, Poljak exhibits his greatest success on hard courts, boasting a 59% win rate with a record of 108 wins against 74 losses. Conversely, Jucha favors clay, holding a 59% win rate with a record of 13 wins to 9 losses. However, Jucha's performance diminishes on indoor hard courts, where he has won only 33% of his matches.
When evaluating the competitive level both players face, Poljak frequently competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.22% of those encounters. Jucha participates in similar level events, maintaining an even 50% winning rate. The average ranking of Poljak's opponents over the past year stood at 289.87, while Jucha's opponents were ranked higher on average, at 192.5.
In the deciding set performance for live match predictions, Poljak has a win rate of 46% in these situations, while Jucha's effectiveness is slightly lower at 40%. These differences are pivotal for making predictions on potential match outcomes.
Considering the comprehensive analysis of these statistics, Poljak is likely to have the edge in this upcoming match against Jucha based on their recent form and performance metrics.
Jucha vs Poljak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
William Jucha Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
William Jucha
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
71%
(
25 of
35)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
21 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
6 of
35)
32
Total Points Won
41
|
4-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
Anthony Genov
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Perot
Player
William Jucha
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
Octave Caillat
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
Charlie Camus
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
48
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
William Jucha
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
Clement Kubiak
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Jucha
Player
David Poljak
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
18 of
24)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Tom Zeuch
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Kirill Kalennik
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
German Mingaleev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Gabriele Volpi
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Samuel Stolarik
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (40/39) | Win/Loss | 55% (342/278) |
| 51% (92/87) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (779/662) |
| 51% (921/892) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7129/6622) |
| 57% (8/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (114/76) |
| 59% (13/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (109/112) |
| 44% (19/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (118/89) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 248 | Aces Total | 2623 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 123 | Total Double Faults | 1614 |
| 1:10:23 | Average Match Time | 1:23:10 |
| 245.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.36 |
| 59% (2249/3788) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22196/37198) |
| 70% (1575/2249) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (15566/22196) |
| 49% (749/1539) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7286/15001) |
| 40% (136/336) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1510/3470) |
| 38% (1505/3936) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14280/36400) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 39% (44/69) |
| 51% (40/38) | Futures W/L | 59% (298/209) |
| 50% (39/78) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (337/614) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 65% (11/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (98/191) |
| 41% (9/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (105/206) |
| 77% (47/36) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (339/283) |
| 23% (47/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (339/56) |
| 13% (32/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (281/57) |
Jucha vs. Poljak Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
