William Jansen vs Daniel De Jonge Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance: Jansen leads with a success rate of 46.89% points won on their second serve compared to Jonge's 43.12%. Does this give Jansen an edge? It might, considering high correlation with match outcomes.
• Return game performance: Jonge excels in returning second serves, winning 47.74% of points compared to Jansen's 42.15%. This could be a critical factor in their match.
• Under pressure performance: Jansen has shown better breakpoint saving ability at 60.94%, surpassing Jonge, who has saved 56.18% of breakpoints. A positive indicator for Jansen under tight situations.
• Overall performance: Jonge boasts a higher winning percentage over the last year at 56.86%, while Jansen is at 52.94%. Who shows consistency here? Jonge seems to.
• Best surface: Jansen and Jonge both favor Indoor Hard courts with win percentages of 57% and 64% respectively. Jansen struggles on Grass, while Jonge finds challenges on Clay. Could the surface play a decisive role?
• Competitive level: Both players have performed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Jansen having a slightly higher win rate recently at 60% versus Jonge's 56.86%.
• Direct head-to-head: Jonge has won their only encounter, managing 2 out of 3 sets against Jansen. Does Jonge possess the upper hand in direct confrontations? Yes.
• Average match duration: Matches between the two players average just over two and a half hours, indicating competitive intensity.
• Deciding set performance: While Jansen has a 50% win rate in deciding sets over the last 12 months, Jonge is at 40%. Can Jansen capitalize if the match goes the distance?
• Break point conversion: Jonge is more efficient with a conversion rate of 28.38% compared to Jansen's 24.32%, suggesting a slight advantage in key moments.
• Opponent quality: Jansen generally faces higher-ranked opponents (average rank 351.06) compared to Jonge's competition (average rank 371.14), possibly suggesting tougher matchups for Jansen in the past year.

Editorial Prediction (July 31, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating both players' recent performances, several aspects come into focus. Jansen demonstrates stronger second serve efficiency and performs well under pressure, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. These strengths could serve him well in clutch situations, making him a formidable opponent.

On the other hand, Jonge's return game is superior and he converts break points with marginally better effectiveness. His overall match win rate is higher, and he has a positive head-to-head record against Jansen, providing confidence in crucial moments.

The surface might be favorable for both players, but Jonge's win rate on Indoor Hard surfaces outperforms Jansen's. Considering the direct encounter history and performance statistics, while Jansen has promising attributes, Jonge seems more poised for success.

Based on these observations, Daniel De Jonge is more likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming match.