Wakana Sonobe vs Mai Hontama Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L L L L
Form
L W W W W L W L L LHead-2-Head: Sonobe 1 - 0 Hontama
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sonobe winning 2 and Hontama winning 1. The last match between Sonobe and Hontama was at the W100 Gifu, 01-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Wakana Sonobe getting the victory 6-3 5-7 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wakana Sonobe | 1 |
| Mai Hontama | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Gifu(01-05-2025)
Wakana Sonobe
Mai Hontama
6
3
5
7
7
5
| Sonobe | Stats | Hontama |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (14-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (13-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 307 | Ranking | 191 |
| 287 | Highest Rank | 105 |
| 17 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 4 |
| 64% (51-29) | Career Total W/L | 59% (279-194) |
| $15,700 | Career Prize Money | $575,073 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vekic VS Shnaider PREDICTION Grass
Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg wta
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bublik VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
22 Jun 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 5-7 7-5 |
Stats 
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Mai Hontama
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
120)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
123
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:40:43 | Average Match Time | 2:40:43 |
| 59% (64/109) | 1st Serve % | 66% (79/120) |
| 64% (41/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (46/79) |
| 53% (24/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (16/41) |
| 33% (7/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (6/14) |
| 48% (58/120) | Return Points Win % | 40% (44/109) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sonobe vs Hontama Match Preview :
As we delve into the performance analytics of Hontama and Sonobe over recent months, intriguing patterns emerge that aid in forecasting the outcome of their impending tennis match. Analyzing second serve effectiveness, Sonobe appears slightly more efficient with a success rate of 40.56% in comparison to Hontama's 39.52%. Such nuances in second serve performance often hold a high correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Examining return statistics reveals that Hontama has a slight edge in winning 50.38% of opponent's second serve points, while Sonobe trails at 49.75%. The distinction becomes more marked when considering first serve return points, with Hontama outperforming Sonobe by winning 34.26% against 27.83%. Such metrics contribute significantly when determining the favored competitor in head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, both players have closely matched capabilities in dealing with breakpoints, with Sonobe saving 43.51% compared to Hontama's 42.53%. In such intense match situations, this particular statistic is often useful for in-game betting predictions. Further illustrating overall performance capabilities, over the past year, Sonobe has displayed higher efficiency, with a winning percentage of 70% (W/L 21/9) compared to Hontama's 42.37% (W/L 25/34).
When examining surface preferences, both players favor hard courts, with Sonobe showcasing a strong 70% win rate and Hontama at 61%. The career performance of Hontama shows a balanced (W/L 208/134) on hard surfaces whereas Sonobe has a slight superiority on the same, reinforced by their past match records. Conversely, their career win rates on least favorable surfaces like grass and indoor hard courts display weaknesses.
Level of competition and opponent quality are critical factors in player assessments. Sonobe appears to have competed at a slightly lower threshold, with opponents averaging a rank of 342.37 over the past year. Meanwhile, Hontama faced stiffer competition, averaging opponents with a rank of 251.39. Such metrics reveal Sonobe's consistent performance against perceived weaker opponents while Hontama contends with higher-ranked adversaries.
Another dimension worth considering is the players' performance in deciding sets, where Sonobe demonstrates a clear advantage by winning 56% of these encounters compared to Hontama's 43%. Such statistics are significant predictors especially in matches stretched to the limit, indicating mental and physical resilience.
Finally, we analyze breakpoint opportunities, which underscores both players' conversion rates, with Hontama converting 38.73% and Sonobe 37.84% in recent form. These figures provide key insights for live betting when either player secures a breakpoint situation.
In sum, synthesizing these analytical insights, Sonobe appears to hold a slight ascendancy given their impressive match win rate, first serve return efficiency, and superior performance in decisive sets. Thus, barring exceptional circumstances, Sonobe is anticipated to emerge victorious in the forthcoming encounter.
Sonobe vs Hontama Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Wakana Sonobe Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Wakana Sonobe
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
51
Total Points Won
48
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Wakana Sonobe
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Wakana Sonobe
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Wakana Sonobe
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
56 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Arianna Zucchini
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Gloria Ceschi
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Wakana Sonobe
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Mai Hontama
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
120)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
123
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mai Hontama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Mai Hontama
45%
(
31 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Mai Hontama
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Mai Hontama
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
73 of
100)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
52%
(
50 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
54 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Elena Pridankina
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Mai Hontama
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Renata Jamrichova
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Tereza Martincova
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
85%
(
58 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (51/29) | Win/Loss | 59% (279/194) |
| 61% (113/71) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (618/457) |
| 56% (917/728) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5191/4513) |
| 69% (22/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (208/135) |
| 62% (29/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (28/24) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (36/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 135 | Aces Total | 181 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 257 | Total Double Faults | 1346 |
| 1:27:21 | Average Match Time | 1:31:35 |
| 390.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 415.1 |
| 56% (2562/4582) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19266/28641) |
| 65% (1658/2562) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (11273/19266) |
| 46% (922/2020) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4269/9361) |
| 52% (311/599) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2000/4017) |
| 48% (2186/4553) | Return Points Win % | 48% (14133/29179) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (15/15) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 50% (9/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 80% (8/2) |
| 60% (3/2) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (28/29) |
| 62% (24/15) | Challenger W/L | 60% (191/127) |
| 69% (24/11) | Futures W/L | 70% (28/12) |
| 64% (51/80) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (277/466) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 36% (4/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (43/87) |
| 54% (13/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (73/134) |
| 89% (53/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (269/236) |
| 11% (53/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (269/32) |
| 15% (27/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (204/43) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
