Vivien Sandberg vs Eva Garkusha Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandberg vs Garkusha analysis and find out who is favored!
Vivien Sandberg vs Eva Garkusha Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandberg has won 49.55% of points on his second serve, while Garkusha has won 37.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandberg, in recent form, has won 58.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Garkusha has won 59.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.17% and 42.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandberg has saved 44.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garkusha has saved 54.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandberg has won 38.46% of matches played (W/L 10/ 16), with Garkusha winning 51.79% (W/L 29/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandberg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 29/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Garkusha has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 6/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 34% (W/L 11/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13), where as Garkusha has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sandberg winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sandberg winning 2 and Garkusha winning 0. The last match between Sandberg and Garkusha was at the W15 Antalya, 25-05-2021, Q3, Clay with Vivien Sandberg getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandberg and Garkusha have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sandberg winning 0 times and Garkusha 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sandberg winning 0, and Garkusha 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandberg has played against opponents with an average rank of 10.85 while Garkusha has played against players with an average rank of 120.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandberg has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garkusha has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandberg has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garkusha has converted 47.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandberg 1 - 0 Garkusha
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
34% (31-59)
Career Total W/L
48% (116-125)
33% (3-6)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Vivien Sandberg | Eva Garkusha |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Vivien Sandberg | Eva Garkusha |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (3/6) | 50% (10/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 36% (8/14) | 50% (23/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 44% (101/127) | 51% (229/219) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 50% (7/7) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
Aces Total | 0 | 29 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.32 |
DFs Total | 8 | 70 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:24:3 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 106.5 |
1st Serve % | 53% (58/110) | 66% (737/1113) |
1st Serve W% | 41% (24/58) | 60% (445/737) |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (23/52) | 37% (138/376) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (5/13) | 44% (64/146) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (50/114) | 45% (475/1045) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
Futures W/L | 33% (3/6) | 43% (3/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (3/9) | 50% (10/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 89% (9/8) |
1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 11% (9/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Vivien Sandberg Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Karolina Mrazikova
Player
Vivien Sandberg
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 2-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jade Psonka
Player
Vivien Sandberg
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 14-12 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Vivien Sandberg
45%
(
30 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
48 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Eva Garkusha Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maria Andrienko
Player
Eva Garkusha
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marina Melnikova
Player
Eva Garkusha
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
2
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
11
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eunhye Lee
Player
Eva Garkusha
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
65 of
113)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
7
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eva Garkusha
Player
Zoziya Kardava
67%
(
78 of
117)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
19
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
11 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yaroslava Bartashevich
Player
Eva Garkusha
96%
(
51 of
53)
1st Serve %
100%
(
59 of
59)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mayuka Aikawa
Player
Eva Garkusha
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-7(4) 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Diana Demidova
Player
Eva Garkusha
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Eva Garkusha
Player
Ilay Yoruk
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more