C. C. Ruiz
To Win
V. Wolff
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W L W LForm
L W L L L W L L W LThey have played 3 sets in total, with Wolff winning 2 and Frayman winning 1. The last match between Wolff and Frayman was at the W35 Manchester, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Vivian Wolff getting the victory 6-4 5-7 10-6.
W35 Manchester(17-02-2025)
- / First
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 5-7 10-6 |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Daria Frayman
82%
(
64 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
68 of
88)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Recent form in second serve performance is a crucial factor in predicting the outcome of a tennis match. In the past six months, Wolff has shown a slight disadvantage, winning 45.98% of points on their second serve, while Frayman has emerged slightly ahead with a success rate of 46.08%. This statistic exhibits a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Examining return game stats in recent form further sheds light on the potential outcome. Wolff, known for their skillful returns, has won an impressive 59.76% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Frayman has also demonstrated remarkable return game prowess, triumphing in 60.03% of similar situations. When considering first serve returns, Wolff holds a success rate of 42.92%, whereas Frayman boasts 45.84%. These statistics are highly indicative of the players' strengths and can assist in determining the favored contender in this head-to-head matchup.
Assessing the players' composure under pressure is essential in making accurate predictions. In recent form, Wolff has effectively saved 60% of breakpoints, demonstrating their ability to handle crucial moments. In comparison, Frayman has managed to save 57.56% of breakpoints, showcasing a commendable performance in tight situations. This statistic serves as a valuable tool for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
Taking an overview of the players' performance in the past year, Wolff has triumphed in 61.54% of matches played, with a record of 32 wins and 20 losses. Meanwhile, Frayman has achieved an impressive 71.43% success rate, winning 45 matches and losing only 18. These figures provide us with a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
An analysis of the players' performance on different court surfaces reveals intriguing insights. Wolff has achieved their highest career win percentage on Clay, with a success rate of 57% in 108 wins out of 81 matches. However, on Indoor Hard courts, their performance drops slightly, with a win rate of 53% in 16 victories out of 14 encounters. Conversely, Frayman excels on Hard courts, securing an impressive 76% career win percentage with 60 wins out of 19 matches. Nevertheless, their performance on Clay surfaces diminishes, with a win rate of 44% in 4 victories out of 5 matches.
Considering the players' level, it becomes evident that Wolff predominantly competes in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. In this domain, Wolff has won 61.22% of matches played, attaining a record of 30 wins and 19 losses. Similarly, Frayman has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments with similar prize money, securing 60% of victories in 21 matches won out of 14 encounters. When predicting the favorite based on statistics, it is crucial to take into account the level of events at which players have competed.
An assessment of the opponents faced by the players over the last 12 months provides valuable insights into their respective challenges. In this time frame, Wolff has encountered opponents with an average rank of 404.46, highlighting the competitive nature of their matches. Conversely, Frayman has faced opponents with an average rank of 447.48, indicating similarly challenging encounters.
Examining the players' performance in deciding sets can offer valuable information for live predictions and betting purposes. Over the past 12 months, Wolff has emerged victorious in 57% of deciding sets, demonstrating their ability to handle high-pressure situations. In contrast, Frayman has showcased an impressive track record, winning 67% of all matches played on the tour that have reached a deciding set.
While past player performance is undoubtedly critical in predicting tennis matches, it is also essential to consider current event stats for an accurate assessment of in-form players. Observing how players perform at specific events can significantly impact the outcome. For a comprehensive analysis of current event stats, please refer to the relevant section below (eventStats) if the players have participated in the ongoing tournament.
Break point conversion rates play a pivotal role in live betting tips. In recent form, Wolff has successfully converted 46.82% of breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their ability to seize pivotal moments. Similarly, Frayman has displayed proficiency in this area, converting 50.79% of chances to break their opponents' serve. These stats prove instrumental for those seeking in-game betting advice.
For those interested in advanced models that predict tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that it may cater primarily to the stats enthusiasts among us.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sandra Samir
Player
Vivian Wolff
51%
(
48 of
95)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
51 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
14 of
27)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
50%
(
19 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
36
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Mboko
Player
Vivian Wolff
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
87%
(
47 of
54)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Valentina Ryser
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Daria Frayman
82%
(
64 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
68 of
88)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Indianna Spink
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Vivian Wolff
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
73 of
95)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Marie Vogt
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Katherine Sebov
Player
Vivian Wolff
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Daria Frayman
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lois Boisson
Player
Daria Frayman
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
84 of
117)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Vivian Wolff
Player
Daria Frayman
82%
(
64 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
68 of
88)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Kamilla Bartone
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
49
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Freya Christie
Player
Daria Frayman
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Daria Frayman
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Ana Sofia Sanchez
Player
Daria Frayman
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Frayman
Player
Saumya Vig
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
16
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Daria Frayman
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Wolff
View full predicted draw for Frayman