Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vivian Heisen vs Qianhui Tang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heisen vs Tang analysis and find out who is favored!
Vivian Heisen vs Qianhui Tang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heisen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tang has won 45.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heisen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tang has won 52.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heisen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tang has saved 58.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heisen has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Tang winning 52.17% (W/L 12/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heisen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 30/ 27). Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 58/ 54), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Heisen has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heisen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Heisen winning 2 and Tang winning 0. The last match between Heisen and Tang was at the W100 Manchester, 11-06-2019, Q3, Grass with Vivian Heisen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heisen and Tang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Heisen winning 0 times and Tang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Heisen winning 0, and Tang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heisen has played against opponents with an average rank of 441.5 while Tang has played against players with an average rank of 181.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heisen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tang has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heisen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tang has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Heisen 1 - 0 Tang
805
Rank
328
High
30
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
887
Rank
617
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (201-151)
Career Total W/L
51% (72-70)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$7,420
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Vivian Heisen | Qianhui Tang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vivian Heisen | Qianhui Tang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (84/88) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 428 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (379/598) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (236/379) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (100/219) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (28/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (243/577) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Vivian Heisen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Vivian Heisen
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
8 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Vivian Heisen
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Alicia Smith
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 1-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Vivian Heisen
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Di Giuseppe
Player
Vivian Heisen
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Vivian Heisen
76%
(
76 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
48 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Leonie Kung
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maryna Zanevska
Player
Vivian Heisen
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Svenja Ochsner
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
57
Total Points Won
50
|
3-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Qianhui Tang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Xinxin Yao
Player
Qianhui Tang
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qianhui Tang
Player
Misaki Matsuda
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
78%
(
84 of
108)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Qianhui Tang
Player
Ho Ching Wu
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Qianhui Tang
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Qianhui Tang
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
2
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
49 of
88)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
66 of
130)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Qianhui Tang
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
67 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
48 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Qianhui Tang
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Fang An Lin
Player
Qianhui Tang
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Heisen Vs Tang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
