Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vivian Heisen vs Maddison Inglis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heisen vs Inglis analysis and find out who is favored!
Vivian Heisen vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heisen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Inglis has won 48.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heisen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 53.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heisen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 56.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heisen has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Inglis winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heisen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 30/ 27). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Heisen has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heisen winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Heisen winning 2 and Inglis winning 1. The last match between Heisen and Inglis was at the Brisbane, 01-10-2018, Q3, Hard with Vivian Heisen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heisen and Inglis have played a deciding set 1 times, with Heisen winning 1 times and Inglis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Heisen winning 1, and Inglis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heisen has played against opponents with an average rank of 441.5 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 289.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heisen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heisen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 47.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Heisen 1 - 0 Inglis
805
Rank
328
High
30
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
305
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
57% (201-151)
Career Total W/L
59% (243-171)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (12-6)
$7,420
Career Prize Money
$423,460
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Vivian Heisen | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:40:0 | 2:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (63/102) | 72% (84/116) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (43/63) | 63% (53/84) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (22/39) | 50% (16/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (47/116) | 36% (37/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Vivian Heisen
Player
Maddison Inglis
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
84 of
116)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vivian Heisen | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (26/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (207/157) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 234.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (676/1066) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (454/676) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (196/390) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (67/146) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (550/1202) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Vivian Heisen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Vivian Heisen
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
8 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Vivian Heisen
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Alicia Smith
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 1-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Vivian Heisen
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Di Giuseppe
Player
Vivian Heisen
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Vivian Heisen
76%
(
76 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
48 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Leonie Kung
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
0
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maryna Zanevska
Player
Vivian Heisen
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vivian Heisen
Player
Svenja Ochsner
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
57
Total Points Won
50
|
3-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arianne Hartono
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Heisen Vs Inglis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maddison Inglis
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
