Prediction of Vit Kopriva vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
59% (373-255)
Career Total W/L
63% (347-201)
71% (5-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$510,660
Career Prize Money
$140,605
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Vit Kopriva
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| stats | Vit Kopriva | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:1 | 1:30:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (32/55) | 55% (38/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (9/23) | 61% (19/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 18% (2/11) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (29/69) | 53% (29/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vit Kopriva vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kopriva 0 - 1 Carabelli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kopriva has won 50.3% of points on their second serve, while Carabelli has won 47.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kopriva, in recent form, has won 53.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 54.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.05% and 35.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kopriva has saved 58.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 63.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kopriva has won 59.42% of matches played (W/L 41/ 28), with Carabelli winning 65.12% (W/L 56/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kopriva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 264/ 172), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 15/ 18). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 314/ 170), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kopriva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.79% of matches (W/L 27/ 16), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.12% of matches (W/L 51/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kopriva winning 0 times and Carabelli being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kopriva winning 0 and Carabelli winning 2. The last match between Kopriva and Carabelli was at the Montevideo Challenger, 12-11-2024, First, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kopriva and Carabelli have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kopriva winning 0 times and Carabelli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kopriva winning 0, and Carabelli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kopriva has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.86 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of 231.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kopriva has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kopriva has converted 50.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 50.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
22 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Nick Hardt
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Vit Kopriva
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Constant Lestienne
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Vit Kopriva
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Damir Dzumhur
47%
(
35 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
37 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Mitchell Krueger
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
50 of
62)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Vit Kopriva
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Elmer Moller
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
102 of
168)
1st Serve %
63%
(
112 of
178)
7
Aces
10
16
Double Faults
9
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
81 of
112)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
39%
(
65 of
168)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
71 of
178)
174
Total Points Won
172
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
68 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
19
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
87%
(
59 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
57 of
81)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
37 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Renzo Olivo
85%
(
56 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
48%
(
49 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Remy Bertola
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Bautista Torres
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Murkel Dellien
57%
(
68 of
119)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
126)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
126)
128
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Vit Kopriva
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Kopriva vs Carabelli?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kopriva Vs Carabelli is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vit Kopriva | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 40% (2/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (85/71) | 48% (26/28) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 208.86 | 121 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (304/516) | 63% (112/178) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (208/304) | 72% (81/112) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (109/212) | 39% (26/66) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (25/48) | 50% (7/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (200/483) | 39% (65/168) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Vit Kopriva
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
