T. Gibson
To Win
E. N. Milic
To Win
Viola Turini vs Ela Nala Milic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
L L W W W L W W L LHead-to-head: Turini 0 - 1 Milic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Turini winning 0 and Milic winning 2. The last match between Turini and Milic was at the W15 Monastir, 18-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Ela Nala Milic getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
W15 Monastir(18-02-2025)
6
4
6
3
Upcoming Match
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Viola Turini
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
7
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
0
3
Total Double Faults
3
1:36:5
Average Match Time
1:36:5
47% (26/55)
1st Serve %
78% (49/63)
65% (17/26)
1st Serve Win %
63% (31/49)
45% (13/29)
2nd Serve Win %
36% (5/14)
40% (2/5)
Break Points Won % (Total)
67% (4/6)
43% (27/63)
Return Points Win %
45% (25/55)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Viola Turini vs Ela Nala Milic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Viola Turini 0 - 1 Ela Nala Milic
In the realm of tennis prognostications, one must decipher a plethora of statistical indicators to forecast the outcome of a match. Here, we delve into various facets of the upcoming tennis clash to unearth illuminating insights for our esteemed readers.
Firstly, let us analyze the recent form of the players, specifically their performance on second serves. Over the past six months, Turini has demonstrated proficiency, winning an impressive 45.04% of points on their second serve. In comparison, Milic has secured victory on 42.74% of such points. This particular statistic holds a significant correlation to the accuracy of match predictions.
Next, we turn our attention to the return game statistics. In recent form, Turini has exhibited exceptional prowess, triumphing in 59.09% of their opponents' second serve points. Conversely, Milic has achieved success on 54.4% of these occasions. The first serve returns present another intriguing angle, with Turini boasting a 40.19% success rate and Milic closely following with 42.45%. The analysis of these figures bears a high correlation to determine the favored player in this head-to-head (H2H) encounter.
Furthermore, our investigation extends to evaluating the players' ability to perform under pressure. Turini has displayed resilience, saving 55.03% of breakpoints in recent times, while Milic has managed to rescue 49.76% of such critical moments. This invaluable statistic holds particular significance for those inclined towards in-game betting predictions.
A comprehensive overview of the players' performances over the past year allows us to glean valuable insights. Turini has emerged triumphant in 59.18% of matches played, amassing a commendable win-loss record of 29 wins and 20 losses. Meanwhile, Milic has secured victory in 47.37% of matches, with a win-loss record of 18 wins and 20 losses. This provides us with an encompassing head-to-head prediction overview.
Now, we delve into the impact of different surfaces on the players' performances. Turini has showcased a remarkable career win percentage of 66% on hard courts, while their record on indoor hard courts stands at a discouraging 0%. In contrast, Milic excels on clay courts, recording a career win percentage of 51%, but struggles on indoor hard courts, with a win percentage of 22%. Acknowledging these surface-based variances sheds light on discerning the players' capabilities.
To comprehensively gauge the players' levels, we consider their participation in various tournaments. Turini has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a stake of $10K, triumphing in an impressive 60.98% of matches. On the other hand, Milic has predominantly engaged in higher-level competitions such as Challengers/ITF tournaments with a purse greater than $10K, securing victory in 47.83% of matches. The evaluation of these statistics necessitates a relative comparison to the event level at which the players have been performing.
Considering the caliber of opponents faced also forms a significant aspect of our analysis. Over the past 12 months, Turini has encountered rivals with an average rank of 404.78, while Milic has confronted adversaries with an average rank of 381.47. This insight adds another layer of understanding to the players' performance levels.
For those engrossed in live predictions and betting, the players' performances during deciding sets assume paramount importance. Turini has emerged triumphant in 47% of deciding sets in the last 12 months, highlighting their tenacity in clutch situations. Conversely, Milic has attained victory in 54% of matches played on the tour. These figures warrant meticulous consideration for in-game predictions.
The relevance of past player performance in predicting tennis matches cannot be understated. However, once an event is underway, it becomes imperative to shift focus towards current event statistics to gauge the form of players. To access a deeper understanding of the in-form players, we direct our readers to peruse the section below for pertinent details (in case the players have already competed in the current event). Moreover, it is crucial to acknowledge the influence of certain events on players' performance and duly account for such factors when predicting the outcome.
Break point conversion assumes great significance in assessing players' capabilities. In recent times, Turini has impressively converted 56.1% of breakpoint opportunities, while Milic has capitalized on 45.24% of chances to break their opponents' serve. This discerning statistic provides invaluable insights for those seeking in-game, live betting tips during pivotal moments.
For those intrigued by the realm of predictive models for tennis matches, we recommend reading an article that offers an excellent starting point for statistical enthusiasts. The article can be accessed through this link: [article](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330883807_Predicting_the_Outcome_of_a_Tennis_Tournament_Based_on_Both_Data_and_Judgments) (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Viola Turini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Tsygourova
Player
Viola Turini
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Weronika Falkowska
Player
Viola Turini
59%
(
71 of
120)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
106)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
49 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
122
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viola Turini
Player
Angelica Raggi
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Viola Turini
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Viola Turini
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viola Turini
Player
Yuhan Liu
42%
(
16 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
16 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
51
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viola Turini
Player
Arabella Koller
51%
(
42 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
62 of
87)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Viola Turini
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viola Turini
Player
Sara Lanca
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ela Nala Milic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eryn Cayetano
Player
Ela Nala Milic
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulia Morlet
Player
Ela Nala Milic
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Moeka Miyata
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
55%
(
37 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Viola Turini
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Ela Nala Milic
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
59% (55/39)
Win/Loss
47% (42/48)
56% (119/95)
Sets Win/Loss
47% (99/110)
53% (1044/941)
Games Win/Loss
49% (960/1001)
64% (29/16)
Hard Win/Loss
48% (20/22)
58% (23/17)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (20/19)
33% (3/6)
Indoor Hard W/L
22% (2/7)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.06
Aces Per Game
0.05
57
Aces Total
49
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.29
266
Total Double Faults
279
1:12:42
Average Match Time
1:18:17
362.45
Average Opponent Rank
456.2
59% (2548/4301)
1st Serve %
68% (3140/4606)
57% (1459/2548)
1st Serve Win %
55% (1729/3140)
41% (725/1753)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (597/1466)
52% (277/533)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (274/579)
48% (2053/4289)
Return Points Win %
47% (2059/4379)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
38% (6/10)
Challenger W/L
48% (20/22)
63% (49/29)
Futures W/L
48% (22/24)
58% (54/93)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
47% (42/90)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
63% (12/19)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (8/16)
63% (17/27)
Deciding Set Win %
48% (14/29)
92% (49/45)
1st Set Won, Won Match
78% (45/35)
8% (49/4)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
22% (45/10)
22% (45/10)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
16% (45/7)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ela Nala Milic
View full predicted draw for Milic
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
