Prediction of Viktor Markov vs William Manning Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
53% (19-17)
Career Total W/L
50% (7-7)
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Viktor Markov
Player
William Manning
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| stats | Viktor Markov | William Manning |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:55:0 | 1:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (49/80) | 60% (43/72) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (33/49) | 56% (24/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (15/31) | 52% (15/29) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points Win % | 46% (33/72) | 40% (32/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Viktor Markov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Viktor Markov
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
107)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Viktor Markov
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dhakshineswar Suresh
Player
Viktor Markov
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Markov
Player
William Manning
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 15-13 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Viktor Markov
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Markov
Player
Dinko Dinev
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-5 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Savva Polukhin
Player
Viktor Markov
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
William Manning Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adit Sinha
Player
William Manning
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Manning
Player
Joshua Portnoy
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Markov
Player
William Manning
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 2-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
William Manning
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Manning
Player
Woodson Mcmillin
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
10
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Viktor Markov | William Manning |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (19/17) | 50% (7/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (42/39) | 50% (15/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (424/396) | 51% (154/149) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (16/13) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.12 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 49 | 13 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 | 0.07 |
| Total Double Faults | 80 | 11 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 241.36 | 171.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (640/1196) | 62% (191/309) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 66% (425/640) | 63% (120/191) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (241/556) | 53% (62/118) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (60/126) | 42% (15/36) |
| Return Points Win % | 43% (513/1190) | 42% (148/355) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (19/16) | 50% (7/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (19/36) | 50% (7/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (5/9) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (19/16) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (19/3) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (17/3) | 0% (7/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
