C. L. C. Wong
To Win
D. Altmaier
To Win
Viktor Durasovic vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W L L
Form
W L W L W L L L W LHead-to-head: Durasovic 1 - 0 Wong
They have played 3 sets in total, with Durasovic winning 2 and Wong winning 1. The last match between Durasovic and Wong was at the Glasgow Challenger, 19-02-2025, Second, I.hard with Viktor Durasovic getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Glasgow Challenger(19-02-2025)
4
6
6
1
6
2
Upcoming Match
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomova VS McNally PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
16
Games Won
9
10
Aces (Total)
8
1
Total Double Faults
2
1:43:0
Average Match Time
1:43:0
50% (43/86)
1st Serve %
63% (47/75)
77% (33/43)
1st Serve Win %
70% (33/47)
56% (24/43)
2nd Serve Win %
32% (9/28)
36% (4/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
14% (1/7)
44% (33/75)
Return Points Win %
34% (29/86)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Viktor Durasovic vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Viktor Durasovic 1 - 0 Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In recent times, Durasovic has exhibited an impressive second serve performance, with a remarkable 51.69% success rate in winning points on this crucial shot. Conversely, Wong has shown a slightly lower success rate of 48.54% in winning points on their second serve. It is noteworthy that there exists a noteworthy correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Insights from Return Game Statistics: When focusing on return game statistics, recent data reveals that Durasovic has excelled in winning 52.89% of their opponent's second serve points. In comparison, Wong has obtained a slightly lower success rate of 46.18% in this aspect. Additionally, for first serve returns, Durasovic has achieved a commendable 32.2% success rate, whereas Wong has managed 28.8%. These figures play a significant role in predicting the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
Scrutiny Under Pressure: Notably, Durasovic has demonstrated exceptional resilience under pressure by saving an impressive 70.98% of breakpoints in recent times. In contrast, Wong has saved 65.42% of breakpoints, indicating a commendable but slightly lower level of performance. This statistic proves to be highly valuable for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.
Comprehensive Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Durasovic has emerged victorious in a significant 60.76% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 48 wins and 31 losses. On the other hand, Wong has achieved a commendable 53.75% success rate, with 43 wins and 37 losses to their name. These figures provide us with a comprehensive overview to predict the head-to-head outcome of their upcoming clash.
Surface Specialization: Certain surfaces can favor specific players, and in this regard, Durasovic has showcased their proficiency on hard courts, clinching an impressive 63% of victories (179 wins and 105 losses). Conversely, they have struggled on grass courts, failing to secure a single win out of two matches played. Similarly, Wong has excelled on hard courts, attaining a solid 60% win rate (112 wins and 76 losses), while facing difficulties on grass courts, with no victories in four matches played.
Player Level and Event Comparison: Within the past year, Durasovic has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level, achieving success in 62.5% of matches played (35 wins and 21 losses). In contrast, Wong has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, winning 55.74% of matches (34 wins and 27 losses). When evaluating statistics between players to predict the favorite, it is vital to consider the relative event level at which they have incontestably been performing.
Opponent Quality Assessment: Evaluating the quality of opponents faced by both players over the past 12 months, Durasovic has encountered adversaries with an average ranking of 466.97. In comparison, Wong has competed against players with an average ranking of 255.35, signifying a slightly higher level of opposition.
Deciding Set Performance: In anticipation of live predictions and betting scenarios, it is worth noting that in the past year, Durasovic has emerged victorious in 62% of deciding sets. On the other hand, Wong has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 61% in all matches played on the tour. These figures hold vital relevance should the match extend to a decider set.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical player performance proves invaluable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to analyze current event statistics to gauge the indication of in-form players. Interested individuals are advised to refer to the section below to examine head-to-head statistics within the ongoing tournament. Moreover, certain players tend to deliver better performances at specific events, and such factors must be taken into account when determining the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion: Recent data highlights Durasovic's proficiency in converting 38.87% of breakpoint opportunities, while Wong has achieved a respectable rate of 34.87% in breaking their opponents' serves. This compelling statistic provides valuable insights for in-game live betting tips whenever a breakpoint opportunity arises for either player.
If you are interested in employing predictive models for tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. Kindly note that it is reserved for ardent statistics enthusiasts.
Viktor Durasovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Viktor Durasovic
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
8
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Daniel Rincon
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matteo Martineau
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
10
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
41 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
James Story
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
106)
8
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Viktor Durasovic
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
14
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Benjamin Hassan
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (385/320)
Win/Loss
56% (137/108)
53% (882/773)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (306/264)
51% (8182/7808)
Games Win/Loss
51% (2804/2679)
63% (179/105)
Hard Win/Loss
59% (113/79)
48% (113/121)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (18/17)
50% (93/92)
Indoor Hard W/L
43% (6/8)
0% (0/2)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/4)
0.35
Aces Per Game
0.48
2754
Aces Total
1285
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.19
1784
Total Double Faults
501
1:24:37
Average Match Time
1st Match
492.79
Average Opponent Rank
380.44
59% (25278/42968)
1st Serve %
60% (8991/14993)
70% (17771/25278)
1st Serve Win %
71% (6352/8991)
51% (8987/17690)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (2897/6002)
40% (1559/3934)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (577/1434)
38% (16248/42656)
Return Points Win %
39% (5882/15132)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
33% (2/4)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
40% (2/3)
34% (10/19)
Cups W/L
63% (5/3)
29% (5/12)
Main Tour W/L
38% (3/5)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (129/141)
Challenger W/L
55% (53/44)
62% (241/148)
Futures W/L
60% (72/49)
55% (378/693)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (132/240)
50% (5/10)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (3/3)
54% (135/252)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (43/78)
53% (124/233)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (45/79)
87% (365/318)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (127/111)
13% (365/46)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (127/16)
19% (340/66)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (118/25)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chak Lam Coleman Wong
View full predicted draw for Wong in Miami
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
