V. Durasovic
To Win
F. Passaro
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L W L WForm
L W W L L W L L W LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Durasovic winning 3 and Rai winning 2. The last match between Durasovic and Rai was at the Busan Challenger, 13-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Viktor Durasovic getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Viktor Durasovic | 1 |
Ajeet Rai | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Busan Challenger(13-04-2025)
Durasovic | Stats | Rai |
---|---|---|
54% (19-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (11-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
239 | Ranking | 473 |
238 | Highest Rank | 417 |
28 | Age | 26 |
R | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 4 |
54% (392-330) | Career Total W/L | 56% (191-150) |
$14,785 | Career Prize Money | $3,445 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
12 Jun 2025 / Second
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
13 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Ajeet Rai
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
3-6 6-3 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Ajeet Rai
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 2 |
27 | Games Won | 23 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:44:17 | Average Match Time | 1:44:17 |
58% (86/148) | 1st Serve % | 62% (96/155) |
71% (61/86) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (65/96) |
56% (35/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (26/59) |
38% (8/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (6/14) |
41% (64/155) | Return Points Win % | 35% (52/148) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The upcoming tennis match presents a fascinating opportunity to delve into the players' recent performances and draw comparisons based on statistics. Examining the second serve performance over the last six months, Rai has achieved a win rate of 41.81% on their second serve points, while Durasovic has outperformed slightly with 45.07%. This particular metric holds significant weight in predicting the likely winner of matches.
When analyzing the return game statistics during recent form, Rai has excelled at winning 47.58% of their opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Durasovic has secured 45.5% in the same category. The first serve return stats are closely matched, with Rai achieving 27.2% and Durasovic slightly higher at 27.57%. Such statistics offer valuable insights when determining the favored player in this head-to-head confrontation.
Delving into how each player performs under pressure, Rai has managed to save 52.49% of breakpoints recently, whereas Durasovic boasts a more impressive 58.79% breakpoint save rate. This statistic can be particularly informative for in-game betting predictions as it reflects mental fortitude during critical points.
Examining their overall match performance over the past year, Rai has secured victory in 59.15% of their encounters (42 wins to 29 losses), whereas Durasovic has demonstrated slightly better form with a win rate of 61.11% (44 wins to 28 losses). These figures provide a comprehensive view of their head-to-head prediction.
Player surface preferences and career performances add further context. Rai boasts a 57% win rate on Hard courts (161 wins to 122 losses), marking this as their best surface, while Durasovic shines brightest with a 63% win rate on Hard (180 wins to 107 losses). Conversely, Rai struggles on I.hard, with a win rate of 33%, and Durasovic finds their biggest challenge on Grass, with no wins.
Considering tournament levels, Rai has predominantly played and succeeded at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, achieving a win rate of 62.96% (34 wins to 20 losses). Similarly, Durasovic has participated in the same level events, with a nearly identical win rate of 62.79% (27 wins to 16 losses), which is crucial for relative event-level comparisons.
Opponent quality also plays a role, as Rai's average opponent over the past year had a rank of 443.8, while Durasovic faced slightly tougher competition with an average rank of 424.61. Should the match extend into a deciding set, Durasovic seems to hold an advantage, having won 63% of such scenarios compared to Rai's 53% success rate.
Evaluating current event statistics can also provide insights into form. Should any information be available from their current event performance, it should be considered, as some players tend to excel in specific competitions. Moreover, when it comes to break point conversion, Rai has a recent form rate of 34.31%, whereas Durasovic stands at 29.67%. Such figures are crucial for in-game live betting.
In conclusion, while both athletes present a strong case, Durasovic's consistent edge in several key areas, such as slightly higher win percentages and better form under pressure, makes them the more favorable choice to win this impending matchup based on the analyzed statistics.
Durasovic vs Rai Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
80%
(
71 of
89)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Francesco Passaro
Player
Viktor Durasovic
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Max Houkes
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Viktor Durasovic
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
54 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
118)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Viktor Durasovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Stefano Travaglia
47%
(
45 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
100
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Viktor Durasovic
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
43%
(
28 of
65)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Damm
Player
Ajeet Rai
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
16
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ajeet Rai
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Peliwo
Player
Ajeet Rai
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
42%
(
15 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
9
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
6
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
36%
(
17 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
41 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ajeet Rai
Player
Zijiang Yang
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Ajeet Rai
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ajeet Rai
Player
Benjamin O'Connell
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
40
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54% (392/330) | Win/Loss | 56% (191/150) |
53% (901/797) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (430/339) |
51% (8394/8020) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3751/3356) |
62% (183/110) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (163/126) |
48% (116/126) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (18/14) |
50% (93/92) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) |
0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
2825 | Aces Total | 1679 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
1838 | Total Double Faults | 805 |
1:25:25 | Average Match Time | 1:25:45 |
492.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 468.64 |
59% (25999/44329) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11627/19291) |
70% (18259/25999) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8216/11627) |
51% (9319/18330) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3757/7666) |
40% (1614/4058) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (794/1881) |
38% (16790/44007) | Return Points Win % | 40% (7589/19211) |
34% (10/19) | Cups W/L | 18% (2/9) |
29% (5/12) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
47% (136/151) | Challenger W/L | 41% (22/32) |
62% (241/148) | Futures W/L | 61% (166/104) |
54% (385/710) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (183/319) |
50% (5/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
53% (140/262) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (44/88) |
53% (128/242) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (44/90) |
86% (373/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (196/165) |
14% (373/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (196/30) |
20% (349/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (145/25) |