A. Hertel
To Win
V. Kan
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L W W WForm
W L W L L L L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Kan winning 2 and Bestetti winning 0. The last match between Kan and Bestetti was at the W15 Antalya, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Victoria Kan getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Victoria Kan | 1 |
Giuliana Bestetti | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Antalya(02-04-2025)
Kan | Stats | Bestetti |
---|---|---|
73% (8-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (12-13) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
599 | Ranking | N/A |
151 | Highest Rank | N/A |
29 | Age | 27 |
- | Plays | - |
24 | Titles | 0 |
71% (383-158) | Career Total W/L | 45% (98-118) |
$30,766 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
17 May 2025 / Semifinals
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
18 May 2025 / Final
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Giuliana Bestetti
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
0:54:25 | Average Match Time | 0:54:25 |
39% (18/46) | 1st Serve % | 58% (22/38) |
89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
46% (13/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 13% (2/16) |
86% (6/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
71% (27/38) | Return Points Win % | 37% (17/46) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When stepping onto the tennis court, the subtle dynamics of the second serve can be a game-changer. In the past six months, Bestetti has secured 34.59% of his points from the second serve, while Kan edges slightly ahead with 36%. Could this marginal difference tip the scales in Kan’s favor? The correlation between second serve performance and match predictions could strongly suggest so.
Let's reverse the perspective and look at the return games. Bestetti has been victorious in 51.61% of his opponent's second serve points in recent times, outpacing Kan, who has captured 42.55%. An even greater chasm is visible in first serve return points, with Bestetti winning 40.94% to Kan’s 26.92%. Such discrepancies are critical in discerning the favored contender in their head-to-head confrontations.
Under pressure, how do these players perform? Bestetti manages to save only 33.9% of breakpoints threatened against him, while Kan emerges more resilient with a 40% save rate. If betting on live matches intrigues you, consider these figures as they offer meaningful insights into each player's mettle when the stakes are high.
Analyzing the past year, Bestetti has won 53.85% of his matches, contrasting against Kan's 63.33% win rate. This wider lens provides a comprehensive overview of their overall match predictions. On the clay surface—historically their best—Bestetti has achieved a win rate of 49%, while Kan’s impressive 75% truly outshines, setting a formidable precedent.
Level of play is another dimension worth examining. Bestetti has thrived in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 56.67% of his matches. Kan, however, has proven himself more in the Challengers/ITF events over $10K, boasting a 63.33% win record. It's essential to recognize that these statistics are influenced by the competitive tier they frequent.
But how does the opposition measure up? Bestetti has frequently faced players ranked around 164.79 on average, whereas Kan's opponents have ranked approximately 409.8. The quality of their adversaries undoubtedly casts compelling perspectives on their capabilities.
In matches stretching to a decisive set, Bestetti triumphs, winning 64% of such occasions, whereas Kan claims victory in 50%. This facet holds potential for anticipating outcomes in nail-biting finishes.
Delving into current event statistics is invaluable. Bestetti outshines in breakpoint conversion, seizing 47.62% of these chances lately, surpassing Kan’s 30% success rate. Such insights could be potent for in-game betting when a player stands on the brink of breaking serve.
Weaving together all these metrics drawn from past performances and current form, it appears that Kan might carry an edge in this matchup. Yet, with strategy and determination, Bestetti certainly could defy these predictions and emerge triumphant. Still, weighing the data, Kan's enhanced resilience, superior match-win percentage, and clay court prowess may render him the more predictable victor.
Kan vs Bestetti Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Danielle Daley
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
14 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
47
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Maria Toma
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Patricia Georgiana Goina
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
27 of
36)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ayla Aksu
Player
Victoria Kan
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Valeriya Yushchenko
55%
(
62 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(10) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Agustina Chlpac
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
49
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Melis Sezer
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mirjana Jovanovic
Player
Giuliana Bestetti
55%
(
63 of
115)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
106)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
10
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
51%
(
59 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
58 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
5-7 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Victoria Kan
Player
Giuliana Bestetti
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jiangxue Han
Player
Giuliana Bestetti
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
39%
(
11 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
56%
(
24 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
46
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-7(2) 6-4 10-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
71% (383/158) | Win/Loss | 45% (98/118) |
67% (794/392) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (224/247) |
58% (6001/4268) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (2125/2210) |
58% (38/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (41/55) |
75% (320/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (57/62) |
50% (25/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
826 | Aces Total | 63 |
0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
618 | Total Double Faults | 448 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
571.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 86.38 |
54% (10527/19666) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3374/5634) |
65% (6876/10527) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (1892/3374) |
47% (4280/9139) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (879/2260) |
51% (1465/2864) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (364/713) |
49% (9903/20117) | Return Points Win % | 47% (2615/5582) |
25% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
64% (203/113) | Challenger W/L | 33% (4/8) |
83% (178/37) | Futures W/L | 46% (94/110) |
71% (375/527) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (97/210) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
46% (34/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (20/39) |
69% (79/114) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (16/45) |
95% (348/329) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (103/89) |
5% (348/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (103/14) |
27% (193/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (113/9) |