Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vicky VAN DE Peer vs Amelie Van Impe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peer vs Impe analysis and find out who is favored!
Vicky VAN DE Peer vs Amelie Van Impe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Impe has won 44.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Impe has won 57.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Impe has saved 54.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Impe winning 62.71% (W/L 37/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Impe has played against players with an average rank of 172.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Impe has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Impe has converted 48.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peer 0 - 0 Impe
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vicky VAN DE Peer | Amelie Van Impe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 1st Match | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 38% (6/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 45% (70/86) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1st Match | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 1st Match | 2 |
| DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 1st Match | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 315.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 1st Match | 75% (329/441) |
| 1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 60% (197/329) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 40% (45/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 49% (21/43) |
| Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 42% (174/417) |
| Slam W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 1st Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 1st Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 1st Match | 40% (5/2) |
Vicky VAN DE Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Caroline Werner
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
78%
(
25 of
32)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Unknown Player
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kozarov
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Eleejah Inisan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Melissa Moueza
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Lew Yan Foon
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Aminata Sall
76%
(
95 of
125)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
118)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
14
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vicky Van De Peer
Player
Nehanda Thomias
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Maklakova
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Amelie Van Impe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Amelie Van Impe
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
10
Total Points Won
11
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Amelie Van Impe
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
14
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Sina Herrmann
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Amelie Van Impe
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
83)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Laura Hietaranta
79%
(
81 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Amelie Van Impe
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
82%
(
62 of
76)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Amelie Van Impe
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Van Impe
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cagla Buyukakcay
Player
Amelie Van Impe
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Amelie Van Impe
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peer Vs Impe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
