Viacheslav Bielinskyi vs Vlado Jankanj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W L W L
Form
W L W W L W L L W LHead-to-head: Bielinskyi 0 - 1 Jankanj
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bielinskyi winning 0 and Jankanj winning 2. The last match between Bielinskyi and Jankanj was at the M15 Antalya, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Vlado Jankanj getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
M15 Antalya(19-02-2025)
6
3
6
0
50% (5-5)
YTD Win/Loss
50% (4-4)
0
Head-to-Head
1
555
Ranking
N/A
464
Highest Rank
21
Age
18
-
Plays
-
5
Titles
0
59% (104-71)
Career Total W/L
48% (20-22)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
1
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Bielinskyi VS Jankanj H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Vlado Jankanj
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
40%
(
17 of
43)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Bielinskyi VS Jankanj H2H Stats
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
3
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
4
4
Total Double Faults
1
1:2:40
Average Match Time
1:2:40
75% (33/44)
1st Serve %
40% (17/43)
48% (16/33)
1st Serve Win %
76% (13/17)
9% (1/11)
2nd Serve Win %
58% (15/26)
33% (1/3)
Break Points Won % (Total)
75% (6/8)
35% (15/43)
Return Points Win %
61% (27/44)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Viacheslav Bielinskyi vs Vlado Jankanj Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Viacheslav Bielinskyi 0 - 1 Vlado Jankanj
Predictions theme: As we delve into the upcoming tennis match, let's analyze various factors to make insightful predictions.
Second serve performance recent form: Observing the last six months, it is evident that Bielinskyi has mastered the art of their second serve, winning an impressive 52.5% of points. On the other hand, Jankanj's second serve success stands at 42.86%. Notably, there exists a significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game stats recent form: In terms of return game performance, recent statistics shine a light on Bielinskyi's exceptional abilities. Proving their prowess, they have triumphed in 51.7% of their opponent's second serve points. Jankanj, on the other hand, has secured a respectable 46.22% in this aspect. Analyzing the first serve returns reveals Bielinskyi with a success rate of 37.79%, while Jankanj trails with 33.91%. These numbers boast a strong correlation when determining the favored contender in this head-to-head battle.
Under pressure analysis: Examining players' performance under pressure adds further insight. Bielinskyi impresses by saving 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form. In contrast, Jankanj's resilience amounts to a commendable 54.05%. This statistic serves as a valuable tool for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Reflecting upon the past year, Bielinskyi has achieved victory in a remarkable 67.39% of matches played, boasting a win/loss ratio of 31/15. Conversely, Jankanj's success rate stands at a solid 50%, with an identical win/loss record of 18/18. Considering these figures, we gain an overall prediction overview for this enticing clash.
Best surface: Recognizing the importance of surface preference, we observe Bielinskyi's exceptional career win percentage on Clay, amounting to a solid 61% (W/L 92/59). However, their proficiency on Indoor Hard courts diminishes, as shown by their win percentage of 25% (W/L 1/3). Jankanj thrives on Clay, achieving a career win percentage of 48% (W/L 19/21), while surprisingly experiencing similar struggles on the same surface, once again accumulating a win percentage of 48% (W/L 19/21).
Player level: Assessing players' competencies within the last year, Bielinskyi predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize of $10K. Remarkably, they secured victory in 68.89% of matches played (W/L 31/14). Conversely, Jankanj's focus revolved around the same category of tournaments, attaining a respectable 50% success rate (W/L 18/18). It is crucial to consider the relative event level they have been involved in when comparing statistics to predict the favored contender.
Opponent quality stats: Scrutinizing the past 12 months, Bielinskyi frequently faced opponents with an average rank of 490.89. In contrast, Jankanj's opponents displayed a significantly higher average rank of 72.86. This factor further elucidates the players' performances.
Deciding set performance vs all players: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts eagerly awaiting a thrilling deciding set, Bielinskyi's track record indicates success. Over the past year, they have emerged victorious in 56% of deciding sets, while Jankanj possesses a comparatively modest record of 20% in all matches played on tour.
Current event H2H stats: Past player performance undeniably plays a crucial role in tennis match predictions. Nevertheless, once an event commences, turning our attention to current event statistics becomes essential in gauging the form of the players. Let us direct our attention to the insightful section below for a comprehensive understanding (provided they have participated in the current event). Additionally, certain individuals thrive in specific events, influencing the outcome and inevitably shaping our predictions.
Break point conversion: Recent statistics disclose that Bielinskyi consistently seizes opportunities, effectively converting 46.99% of breakpoints offered. Conversely, Jankanj achieves a lower conversion rate, successfully capitalizing on 34.48% of chances to break their opponent's serve. This revealing statistic serves as a valuable resource for in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
If you possess an inclination towards models that predict tennis matches accurately, I encourage you to explore and familiarize yourself with this article (Warning: Exclusive access for passionate stats enthusiasts).
Viacheslav Bielinskyi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Kane Bonsach Ganley
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
83%
(
49 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Luka Mikrut
88%
(
81 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Andrey Chepelev
84%
(
72 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlado Jankanj
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
40%
(
17 of
43)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
52%
(
56 of
108)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
48%
(
25 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuele Seghetti
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Vlado Jankanj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Vlado Jankanj
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlado Jankanj
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
40%
(
17 of
43)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Vlado Jankanj
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
40%
(
44 of
111)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
60 of
111)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-4 13-11 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martinez
Player
Vlado Jankanj
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gretskiy
Player
Vlado Jankanj
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
64)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
59% (104/71)
Win/Loss
48% (20/22)
58% (225/164)
Sets Win/Loss
50% (47/47)
54% (1905/1642)
Games Win/Loss
52% (479/447)
54% (7/6)
Hard Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
61% (96/62)
Clay Win/Loss
48% (20/22)
25% (1/3)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.07
Aces Per Game
0.09
115
Aces Total
39
0.17
Double Faults Per Game
0.1
286
Total Double Faults
47
1:27:21
Average Match Time
1st Match
495.91
Average Opponent Rank
74.95
71% (6967/9846)
1st Serve %
46% (385/833)
62% (4351/6967)
1st Serve Win %
69% (266/385)
49% (1416/2879)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (196/448)
47% (620/1317)
Break Points Won % (Total)
35% (34/96)
45% (4606/10164)
Return Points Win %
41% (356/877)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Challenger W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (102/67)
Futures W/L
48% (20/22)
62% (103/166)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
46% (19/41)
33% (1/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
48% (16/33)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
44% (4/9)
65% (28/43)
Deciding Set Win %
27% (3/11)
91% (94/86)
1st Set Won, Won Match
80% (25/20)
9% (94/8)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
20% (25/5)
23% (80/18)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (17/0)
See recent tennis photos of Bielinskyi and Jankanj
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
