Prediction of Veronika Erjavec vs Suzan Lamens Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
63% (243-141)
Career Total W/L
58% (289-210)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$225,000
Career Prize Money
$349,233
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| stats | Veronika Erjavec | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 22 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:0 | 1:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (84/163) | 63% (104/165) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (49/84) | 72% (75/104) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (38/79) | 52% (32/61) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 42% (8/19) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (58/165) | 47% (76/163) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Veronika Erjavec vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Erjavec 0 - 2 Lamens
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Erjavec has won 52.64% of points on their second serve, while Lamens has won 45.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Erjavec, in recent form, has won 56.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 54.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.63% and 40.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Erjavec has saved 58.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 54.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Erjavec has won 61.04% of matches played (W/L 47/ 30), with Lamens winning 63.64% (W/L 49/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Erjavec has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 210/ 107), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Lamens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 30/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Erjavec has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.08% of matches (W/L 41/ 22), where as Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 24/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Erjavec winning 0 times and Lamens being victorious 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Erjavec winning 1 and Lamens winning 4. The last match between Erjavec and Lamens was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 12-01-2025, First, Hard with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 7-5 7-6(2).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Erjavec and Lamens have played a deciding set 1 times, with Erjavec winning 0 times and Lamens 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Erjavec winning 0, and Lamens 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Erjavec has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.03 while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 192.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Erjavec has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Erjavec has converted 50.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 51.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Veronika Erjavec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Petra Martic
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Alana Subasic
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Veronika Erjavec
43%
(
33 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Arantxa Rus
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
37 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Panna Udvardy
36%
(
18 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Suzan Lamens
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renee Alame
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Magdalena Frech
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Suzan Lamens
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Robin Anderson
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Erjavec vs Lamens?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Erjavec Vs Lamens is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Veronika Erjavec | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 57% (8/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (55/40) | 51% (68/66) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 15 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:8 | 1:28:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 111.2 | 98.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (198/335) | 57% (259/451) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (130/198) | 66% (171/259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (64/137) | 46% (89/192) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (21/50) | 48% (21/44) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (167/351) | 43% (180/414) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
