Valerio Aboian vs Daniel DE Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Aboian vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Valerio Aboian vs Daniel DE Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Aboian has won 50.81% of points on his second serve, while Jonge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Aboian, in recent form, has won 53.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.2% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Aboian has saved 60.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Aboian has won 63.95% of matches played (W/L 55/ 31), with Jonge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Aboian has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 158/ 86), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 158/ 86). Jonge has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Aboian has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.24% of matches (W/L 39/ 19), where as Jonge has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Aboian has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.21 while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Aboian has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Aboian has converted 44.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Aboian 0 - 0 Jonge
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Valerio Aboian | Daniel DE Jonge |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (12/7) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (28/19) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (228/210) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.37 | N/A |
Aces Total | 79 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.16 | N/A |
DFs Total | 35 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:4 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 303.16 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 62% (876/1404) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 66% (582/876) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (272/528) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (67/146) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 42% (600/1439) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 69% (11/5) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (12/19) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | N/A |
Valerio Aboian Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Maximo Zeitune
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gustavo Heide
Player
Valerio Aboian
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Kaichi Uchida
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
15
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Alvaro Frutos Alonso
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gianluca Mager
Player
Valerio Aboian
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Blaise Bicknell
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Jan Henrik Paul
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Valerio Aboian
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Daniel DE Jonge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Massimo Giunta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel De Jonge
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ignasi Forcano
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Daniel De Jonge
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
12
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
8
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more