Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Valentin Vanta vs Matteo DE Vincentis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vanta vs Vincentis analysis and find out who is favored!
Valentin Vanta vs Matteo DE Vincentis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vanta has won 51.16% of points on his second serve, while Vincentis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vanta, in recent form, has won 40.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vincentis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vanta has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vincentis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vanta has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 15/ 18), with Vincentis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vanta has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 16/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 162/ 150). Vincentis has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Vanta has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 15/ 18), where as Vincentis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vanta has played against opponents with an average rank of 94.39 while Vincentis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vanta has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vincentis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vanta has converted 63.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vincentis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vanta 0 - 0 Vincentis
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Valentin Vanta | Matteo DE Vincentis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (74/75) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (130/173) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (75/130) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (22/43) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 64% (7/11) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (53/131) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
Valentin Vanta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Jasza Szajrych
Player
Valentin Vanta
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
15 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-0 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Radovan Michalik
Player
Valentin Vanta
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Shendrit Deari
Player
Valentin Vanta
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Valentin Vanta
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
78%
(
56 of
72)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Valentin Vanta
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
81%
(
35 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
39
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vanta
Player
Antonio Caruso
88%
(
75 of
85)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Valentin Vanta
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo DE Vincentis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Igor Trunov
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
6
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Andre Szilvassy
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Furlanetto
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Vanta Vs Vincentis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
