Valentin Vacherot vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W W L L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LH2H: Vacherot 1 - 0 Imamura
They have played 2 sets in total, with Vacherot winning 2 and Imamura winning 0. The last match between Vacherot and Imamura was at the Pune Challenger, 19-02-2025, Second, Hard with Valentin Vacherot getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Valentin Vacherot | 1 |
| Masamichi Imamura | 0 |
Pune Challenger(19-02-2025)
6
2
6
3
| Vacherot | Stats | Imamura |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (11-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (8-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 265 | Ranking | 338 |
| 110 | Highest Rank | 331 |
| 26 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 1 |
| 65% (245-133) | Career Total W/L | 60% (150-100) |
| $232,085 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:4:14 | Average Match Time | 1:4:14 |
| 73% (36/49) | 1st Serve % | 51% (26/51) |
| 67% (24/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (19/26) |
| 85% (11/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (25/51) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Valentin Vacherot vs Masamichi Imamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Valentin Vacherot 1 - 0 Masamichi Imamura
Prediction Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match
During the last six months, an analysis of the second serve performance reveals that Vacherot has impressively won 48.33% of points on their second serve, while Imamura has displayed superior form by winning 53.7%. It is worth noting that this particular statistic holds significant weight when it comes to accurately predicting match outcomes.
An examination of return game stats in recent form indicates that Vacherot has triumphed in 52.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Imamura's performance stands at 50.85%. Likewise, when considering first serve returns, the respective percentages are 32.7% for Vacherot and 32.45% for Imamura. Undoubtedly, these numbers greatly influence the assessment of who possesses the advantage in this head-to-head encounter.
A detailed analysis under pressure uncovers that Vacherot has exhibited exemplary resilience by saving 65.82% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Imamura has displayed a marginally lower saving rate of 61.58%. This statistic is particularly useful for making predictions during in-game betting.
Over the past year, Vacherot's remarkable performance has resulted in a winning percentage of 65.22% (W/L 30/16), while Imamura has also excelled with a winning percentage of 64.37% (W/L 56/31). Considering these figures, an overall prediction overview can be established for their head-to-head encounters.
When examining the players' performance on different surfaces, it is evident that Vacherot shines brightest on hard courts, amassing an impressive win percentage of 72% (W/L 115/44). Conversely, their performance on grass surfaces leaves much to be desired, with a win percentage of 0% (W/L 0/1). As for Imamura, their career surface win percentage is highest on indoor hard courts at 67% (W/L 6/3). However, they struggle more on clay surfaces with a win percentage of 50% (W/L 6/6).
Focusing on the player level in the past year, Vacherot has predominantly competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments worth more than $10,000. In this context, they have secured victories in 75% of their matches (W/L 18/6). On the other hand, Imamura has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10,000, prevailing in an impressive 69.84% of matches (W/L 44/19). Consequently, when predicting the favorite in relation to the players' statistics, it is vital to consider the caliber of the events in which they have been competing.
Over the course of the last 12 months, Vacherot has faced opponents with an average rank of 233.15, while Imamura has encountered players with an average rank of 206.69. These opponent quality stats provide valuable insight into the level of competition both players have been exposed to.
Moving on to deciding set performances, if this match progresses to a deciding set, Vacherot has emerged victorious in 65% of such sets over the past year, compared to Imamura's success rate of 52% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics are of considerable interest to those engaged in live predictions and betting.
While past player performance undoubtedly offers considerable value in predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to consider current event H2H stats for indications of in-form players during an ongoing event. Thus, it is advisable to refer to the section below for up-to-date statistics if the players have already taken part in matches within the current tournament. Additionally, it is worth noting that certain players often demonstrate superior performances at specific events, a factor that should be taken into account when determining the likely outcome.
Significantly, recent form indicates that Vacherot capitalized on 43.04% of breakpoint opportunities, while Imamura seized 41.18% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves pivotal for making live betting decisions when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in advanced models for predicting tennis matches, an informative article is available as a valuable resource. However, it is advised that only true statistics enthusiasts delve into its contents.
Valentin Vacherot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Valentin Vacherot
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Valentin Vacherot
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Raul Brancaccio
71%
(
74 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
29 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Michiel De Krom
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
48
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Alexander Donski
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Valentin Vacherot
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Valentin Vacherot
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
6
Aces
17
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Elmer Moller
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Valentin Vacherot
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
78 of
116)
5
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Masamichi Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Masamichi Imamura
47%
(
44 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianhui Zhang
Player
Masamichi Imamura
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhengyu Sun
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Blake Ellis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Masamichi Imamura
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Aryan Shah
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (245/133) | Win/Loss | 60% (150/100) |
| 61% (537/337) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (330/230) |
| 55% (4552/3789) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2833/2414) |
| 72% (116/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (138/91) |
| 63% (123/72) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 30% (6/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1349 | Aces Total | 357 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 639 | Total Double Faults | 254 |
| 1:29:41 | Average Match Time | 1:7:49 |
| 393.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.99 |
| 66% (14754/22237) | 1st Serve % | 66% (7586/11504) |
| 69% (10186/14754) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (4983/7586) |
| 53% (3989/7483) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1950/3918) |
| 43% (974/2281) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (571/1267) |
| 40% (8983/22387) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4950/11845) |
| 63% (5/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (2/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (72/41) | Challenger W/L | 45% (18/22) |
| 68% (159/75) | Futures W/L | 63% (132/78) |
| 65% (241/372) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (149/248) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (62/115) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (28/54) |
| 59% (70/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (30/60) |
| 89% (238/213) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (150/136) |
| 11% (238/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (150/14) |
| 23% (140/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (100/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
