MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Unknown Player [] vs Emily Seibold [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: TBD 0 - 0 Seibold

TBD vs Seibold H2H Profile
TBD Stats Seibold
YTD Win/Loss
0 Head-to-Head 0
N/A Ranking N/A
Highest Rank N/A
- Age 25
- Plays -
0 Titles 2
$0 Career Prize Money $0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

TBD VS Seibold H2H Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Unknown Player vs Emily Seibold Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: TBD 0 - 0 Seibold

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), TBD has won 42.84% of points on their second serve, while Seibold has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show TBD, in recent form, has won 46.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Seibold has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.18% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: TBD has saved 42.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seibold has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year TBD has won 29.46% of matches played (W/L 119/ 285), with Seibold winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: TBD has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 39% (W/L 24/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 8/ 24). Seibold has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
  • Player level: In the last year, TBD has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.92% of matches (W/L 117/ 274), where as Seibold has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, TBD has played against opponents with an average rank of 107.23 while Seibold has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, TBD has won 51% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seibold has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, TBD has converted 35.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seibold has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Unknown Player Recent Matches Played

    Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Julia Grabher
    Player
    Emily Seibold
    75% ( 38 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 38 of 51)
    0
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    68% ( 26 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 19 of 38)
    46% ( 6 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    23% ( 3 of 13)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    37% ( 19 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    57% ( 29 of 51)
    61
    Total Points Won
    41
    L
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Emily Seibold
    Player
    Sofia Milatova
    65% ( 54 of 83)
    1st Serve %
    73% ( 68 of 93)
    4
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    6
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 42 of 68)
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 7 of 25)
    46% ( 6 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    55% ( 6 of 11)
    46% ( 38 of 83)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 44 of 93)
    89
    Total Points Won
    87
    W
    6-4 2-6 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Kathinka Von Deichmann
    Player
    Emily Seibold
    79% ( 88 of 111)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 81 of 126)
    1
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    6
    66% ( 58 of 88)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 48 of 81)
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 21 of 45)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    38% ( 42 of 111)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 57 of 126)
    126
    Total Points Won
    111
    L
    7-6(3) 6-7(8) 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Emily Seibold
    Player
    Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
    66% ( 27 of 41)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 23 of 34)
    1
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    56% ( 15 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    39% ( 9 of 23)
    36% ( 5 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    18% ( 2 of 11)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    51% ( 21 of 41)
    Rtn Points Won
    68% ( 23 of 34)
    43
    Total Points Won
    32
    W
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Emily Seibold
    Player
    Carolina Bohrer Martins
    58% ( 28 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 20 of 33)
    2
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    68% ( 19 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 11 of 20)
    75% ( 15 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 5)
    29% ( 14 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 17 of 33)
    51
    Total Points Won
    30
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Nicole Fossa Huergo
    Player
    Emily Seibold
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 30 of 44)
    1
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 23 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    61% ( 11 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 7 of 14)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    31% ( 15 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 22 of 44)
    56
    Total Points Won
    37
    L
    6-1 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Emily Seibold
    Player
    Antonia Vergara Rivera
    74% ( 43 of 58)
    1st Serve %
    86% ( 42 of 49)
    2
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    70% ( 30 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 20 of 42)
    53% ( 8 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    86% ( 6 of 7)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    34% ( 20 of 58)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 23 of 49)
    61
    Total Points Won
    46
    W
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Emily Seibold
    Player
    Maria Eduarda Lages
    80% ( 28 of 35)
    1st Serve %
    79% ( 41 of 52)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    82% ( 23 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    49% ( 20 of 41)
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    2nd Serve Won
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    20% ( 7 of 35)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 29 of 52)
    57
    Total Points Won
    30
    W
    6-1 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Margaux Rouvroy
    Player
    Emily Seibold
    61% ( 25 of 41)
    1st Serve %
    78% ( 38 of 49)
    1
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    64% ( 16 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    37% ( 14 of 38)
    56% ( 9 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    39% ( 16 of 41)
    Rtn Points Won
    61% ( 30 of 49)
    55
    Total Points Won
    35
    L
    6-1 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Emily Seibold
    Player
    Ana Filipa Santos
    86% ( 31 of 36)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 26 of 47)
    0
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    71% ( 22 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    42% ( 11 of 26)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    2nd Serve Won
    24% ( 5 of 21)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    28% ( 10 of 36)
    Rtn Points Won
    66% ( 31 of 47)
    57
    Total Points Won
    26
    W
    6-1 6-0 H2H
    banner

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    16:00
    Prediction

    Gwangju Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...