Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Uisung Park vs Matthew Christopher Romios Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Park vs Romios analysis and find out who is favored!
Uisung Park vs Matthew Christopher Romios Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Park has won 34.62% of points on his second serve, while Romios has won 49.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Park, in recent form, has won 52.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Romios has won 41.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.83% and 27.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Park has saved 44.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Romios has saved 51.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Park has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 6/ 3), with Romios winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Park has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 98/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 10/ 8). Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 52/ 74).
- Player level: In the last year, Park has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 6/ 1), where as Romios has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 4/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Park winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Park winning 0 and Romios winning 2. The last match between Park and Romios was at the M15 Heraklion, 09-11-2021, First, Hard with Matthew Christopher Romios getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Park and Romios have played a deciding set 0 times, with Park winning 0 times and Romios 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Park winning 0, and Romios 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Park has played against opponents with an average rank of 201 while Romios has played against players with an average rank of 303.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Park has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Romios has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Park has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Romios has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Park 0 - 1 Romios
812
Rank
546
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
889
Rank
563
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
63% (108-63)
Career Total W/L
44% (91-114)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Uisung Park | Matthew Christopher Romios |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (44/66) | 64% (35/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (28/44) | 80% (28/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (9/22) | 65% (13/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 25% (14/55) | 44% (29/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Uisung Park
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Uisung Park | Matthew Christopher Romios |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 18% (2/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 32% (6/13) | 37% (36/62) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.89 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:21 | 1:16:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 426 | 417.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (33/59) | 64% (195/303) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (20/33) | 65% (126/195) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 35% (9/26) | 44% (48/108) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (2/6) | 29% (4/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (22/62) | 28% (83/295) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Uisung Park Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Uisung Park
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rimpei Kawakami
Player
Uisung Park
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Yunseok Jang
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Yunseong Chung
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Kenta Miyoshi
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Uisung Park
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Uisung Park
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
37
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Christopher Romios Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Thomas Fancutt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Colin Sinclair
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tao Mu
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Park Vs Romios Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
