J. Bult
To Win
W. Grant
To Win
Tyler Zink vs William Grant Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L L L
Form
W L W W L L W L W LHead To Head: Zink 2 - 1 Grant
They have played 7 sets in total, with Zink winning 4 and Grant winning 3. The last match between Zink and Grant was at the M15 Orange Park, 02-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Tyler Zink getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tyler Zink | 2 |
| William Grant | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Orange Park(02-05-2025)
Tyler Zink
William Grant
6
1
6
1
| Zink | Stats | Grant |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (25-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (17-17) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 313 | Ranking | 690 |
| 313 | Highest Rank | 614 |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (89-69) | Career Total W/L | 53% (101-91) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alves VS Meza PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Etcheverry VS Agut PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Tyler Zink
Player
William Grant
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
William Grant
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 37 | Games Won | 26 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:35:51 | Average Match Time | 1:35:51 |
| 61% (104/171) | 1st Serve % | 61% (140/228) |
| 77% (80/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (88/140) |
| 55% (37/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (42/88) |
| 39% (11/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 43% (98/228) | Return Points Win % | 32% (54/171) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zink vs Grant Match Preview :
Tyler Zink and Grant will face each other in an upcoming tennis match, with statistics suggesting a closely contested encounter. Over the past year, Zink has displayed superior match performance, securing victory in 68.12% of his matches, while Grant achieved a win rate of 50.85%. This performance disparity provides an overall head-to-head prediction in Zink's favor.
Analyzing their recent form, Zink has outperformed Grant slightly on second serve points, winning 44.68% compared to Grant's 42.86%. Conversely, when it comes to returning games, Grant has excelled by winning 46.77% of his opponent's second serve points, surpassing Zink's 43.03%. Their first serve return statistics are relatively close, with Zink at 25.5% and Grant at 25.08%, indicating minimal difference in their return abilities.
A review of their break-point performance reveals that Zink and Grant are closely matched under pressure, with Zink saving 53% of break points and Grant 53.51%. Despite this minor edge, Zink's higher breakpoint conversion rate of 27.42% as opposed to Grant's 29.49% slightly favors Grant in potential breakpoint scenarios.
On the indoor hard courts, both players have demonstrated notable success. Zink wins 62% on this surface, with Grant slightly behind at 58%. This proficiency might be pivotal, as the match takes place on Zink's preferred surface. Over the past 12 months, average opponent rankings faced by Zink and Grant were 394.88 and 353.78 respectively, indicating Grant might have had a marginally tougher competition.
In head-to-head confrontations, Zink and Grant are evenly matched, with each player securing one victory in their two previous encounters. However, Zink claimed the last match at the M 25 Ithaca, winning in a decisive three-set battle. While Grant has an edge in extreme pressure situations, having won their only tiebreak, Zink has shown superior deciding set performance over the last year, winning 77% of such matches.
Reflecting on these statistics, Zink appears to have a slight edge over Grant. If the match goes the distance, Zink’s proven ability to win deciding sets could be a critical factor. Given these analyses, Tyler Zink seems likely to emerge victorious given his recent form and head-to-head advantage.
Zink vs Grant Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Tyler Zink
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Tyler Zink
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Tyler Zink
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
14
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Oren Vasser
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
William Grant Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
Player
William Grant
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
55
Total Points Won
52
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Alvaro Jimenez
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
51
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
William Grant
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
53
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Andrew Fenty
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve %
73%
(
22 of
30)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
39
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Agassi Rusher
Player
William Grant
63%
(
77 of
122)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
1
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
3
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
58 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
110
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
William Grant
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Yannik Rahman
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Nathan Ponwith
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (89/69) | Win/Loss | 53% (101/91) |
| 54% (192/165) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (226/206) |
| 52% (1770/1664) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2017/1982) |
| 53% (42/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (34/28) |
| 58% (31/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (52/52) |
| 62% (16/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (15/11) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 679 | Aces Total | 554 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 324 | Total Double Faults | 470 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:6 |
| 430.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 350.86 |
| 59% (5759/9803) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5357/9143) |
| 71% (4063/5759) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3602/5357) |
| 50% (2037/4044) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1808/3795) |
| 40% (367/928) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (400/963) |
| 38% (3637/9500) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3770/9307) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 45% (13/16) | Challenger W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 59% (76/53) | Futures W/L | 54% (97/81) |
| 56% (88/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (100/191) |
| 46% (21/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (22/48) |
| 64% (27/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 89% (90/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (100/88) |
| 11% (90/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (100/12) |
| 13% (68/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (92/13) |
Zink vs. Grant Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
