Tyler Zink vs Tristan Mccormick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L L L
Form
W L W L L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Zink 1 - 2 Mccormick
They have played 7 sets in total, with Zink winning 3 and Mccormick winning 4. The last match between Zink and Mccormick was at the M15 Orange Park, 04-05-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Tyler Zink getting the victory 6-3 7-6(0).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tyler Zink | 1 |
| Tristan Mccormick | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Orange Park(04-05-2025)
Tyler Zink
Tristan Mccormick
6
3
7
6
| Zink | Stats | Mccormick |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (25-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 51% (20-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 313 | Ranking | 607 |
| 313 | Highest Rank | 495 |
| 24 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 56% (89-69) | Career Total W/L | 57% (123-94) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vukic VS Duckworth PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bublik VS Comesana PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(0) |
Stats 
Tyler Zink
Player
Tristan Mccormick
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Tyler Zink
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
10
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Tyler Zink
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
9
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 35 | Games Won | 41 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:16:37 | Average Match Time | 2:16:37 |
| 59% (141/238) | 1st Serve % | 62% (158/256) |
| 74% (105/141) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (113/158) |
| 49% (48/97) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (51/98) |
| 28% (5/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 36% (92/256) | Return Points Win % | 36% (85/238) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zink vs Mccormick Match Preview :
When evaluating the second serve performance over the past six months, Mccormick holds a slight edge, capturing 45.14% of points on their second serve compared to Zink's 44.35%. A small advantage, perhaps, but one that could sway the outcome of this match, considering the high correlation between second serve success and match predictions.
In terms of return game stats during the same period, Mccormick has outperformed Zink again by clinching 45.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zink trails at 43.26%. Considering first-serve return points, however, Zink leads slightly, winning 25.6% compared to Mccormick’s 23.46%. This statistical insight brings an interesting predicament on predicting who will have the upper hand in return games.
The ability to handle pressure situations can be crucial, and here, Mccormick again appears more adept, saving 58.05% of breakpoints compared to Zink's 52.73%. A useful insight indeed for those interested in in-game betting strategies.
Mccormick has won 52.11% of their matches over the past year, with a win-loss record of 37-34. In contrast, Zink's performance has been far more impressive, winning 69.01% of matches during the same period, boasting a 49-22 win-loss record. Such data solidifies the picture of an overall favorable outlook on Zink's recent form.
Surface performance may also tilt the odds slightly. Mccormick performs best on clay courts, winning 59% of matches, while Zink shines on indoor hard courts, with a win percentage of 62%. This could become a pivotal factor among the mentioned statistics, depending on the playing surface for their current match.
Player level comparisons reveal that Mccormick has experienced a relatively even split at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments level, securing 50% of victories. Zink, however, has been dominating the same echelon with a 77.55% win record, painting Zink as the stronger contender when dissecting these stats.
Direct head-to-head confrontations tell an intriguing tale. Mccormick leads 2-0 over Zink, having won four out of five sets in these matchups, with their most recent clash seeing Mccormick triumph at the M 25 Tulsa with a 7-6(4), 6-2 victory on hard court. The 2:23:0 average match duration hints at tightly-contested battles between these two.
When the match stretches to a deciding set, Mccormick has won their last encounter, marking 52% success in deciding sets over the previous 12 months. Yet Zink boasts a more impressive 77% success rate in the same scenario, enhancing their reputation as a player with remarkable resilience.
Finally, examining opponent quality, Mccormick has faced higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 327.25 compared to Zink's 393.51. This demonstrates Mccormick's experience against tougher opposition despite the less favorable win record.
To predict the winner, Mccormick's past success in direct head-to-head matchups and adeptness under pressure should give them a slight advantage, despite Zink's superior win percentage over the last year and deciding sets prowess. However, the closeness of their historical encounters and the variables of surface and current form make this a compelling match to watch, with Mccormick having a minor edge in this matchup based on these statistics.
Zink vs Mccormick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Tyler Zink
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Tyler Zink
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Tyler Zink
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
14
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Oren Vasser
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Mccormick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Tristan Mccormick
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
8
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Aryan Shah
100%
(
1 of
1)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
0%
(
0 of
1)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Total Points Won
1
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Ezekiel Clark
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
90%
(
46 of
51)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Tristan Mccormick
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
50
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tristan Mccormick
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Tristan Mccormick
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
11
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Sebastian Gomez
Player
Tristan Mccormick
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
0
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
10
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Juan Trujillo Hernandez
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (89/69) | Win/Loss | 57% (123/94) |
| 54% (192/165) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (276/225) |
| 52% (1770/1664) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2569/2359) |
| 53% (42/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (49/38) |
| 58% (31/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (58/44) |
| 62% (16/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (16/12) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.55 |
| 679 | Aces Total | 1319 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 324 | Total Double Faults | 792 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:39:22 |
| 430.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 424.16 |
| 59% (5759/9803) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7641/12991) |
| 71% (4063/5759) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (5666/7641) |
| 50% (2037/4044) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2693/5351) |
| 40% (367/928) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (464/1207) |
| 38% (3637/9500) | Return Points Win % | 37% (4961/13320) |
| 45% (13/16) | Challenger W/L | 44% (21/27) |
| 59% (76/53) | Futures W/L | 60% (102/67) |
| 56% (88/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (122/214) |
| 46% (21/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (46/87) |
| 64% (27/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (40/70) |
| 89% (90/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (116/101) |
| 11% (90/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (116/15) |
| 13% (68/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (101/22) |
Zink vs. Mccormick Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
