J. A. Hernandez
To Win
T. Zink
To Win
Tyler Zink vs Matias Franco Descotte Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W W L L W L W LHead-2-Head: Zink 1 - 0 Descotte
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zink winning 2 and Descotte winning 0. The last match between Zink and Descotte was at the M15 Rochester, 19-07-2024, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Tyler Zink getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tyler Zink | 1 |
| Matias Franco Descotte | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Rochester(19-07-2024)
Tyler Zink
Matias Franco Descotte
7
5
6
3
| Zink | Stats | Descotte |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (22-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (1-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 344 | Ranking | 860 |
| 344 | Highest Rank | 285 |
| 24 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 57% (86-65) | Career Total W/L | 57% (369-284) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
20 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Efremova VS Friedsam PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
20 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Altmaier VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
20 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Tyler Zink
Player
Matias Franco Descotte
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:29:0 | Average Match Time | 2:29:0 |
| 58% (40/69) | 1st Serve % | 57% (46/80) |
| 78% (31/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (27/46) |
| 48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 48% (38/80) | Return Points Win % | 35% (24/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Sebastian Gima
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Dakotah Bobo
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Justin Boulais
52%
(
64 of
123)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
112)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
42%
(
25 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
116
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Tristan Mccormick
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Tomas Antonio Serrano Luis
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
William Grant
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Keaton Hance
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Matias Franco Descotte Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Matias Franco Descotte
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Arthur Bonnaud
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
99
|
0-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilgiz Valiev
Player
Matias Franco Descotte
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Oliver Bonding
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel La Serna
Player
Matias Franco Descotte
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Matias Franco Descotte
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Hugo Hashimoto
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Ilyas Milad Fahim
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (86/65) | Win/Loss | 57% (369/284) |
| 54% (185/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (821/657) |
| 52% (1697/1595) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7157/6387) |
| 55% (41/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (177/130) |
| 58% (29/21) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (187/147) |
| 62% (16/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (5/7) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 628 | Aces Total | 1302 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 313 | Total Double Faults | 964 |
| 1:32:55 | Average Match Time | 1:22:47 |
| 437.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.01 |
| 59% (5522/9370) | 1st Serve % | 63% (20797/33060) |
| 70% (3888/5522) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (14199/20797) |
| 51% (1947/3848) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6125/12263) |
| 39% (346/888) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1649/3639) |
| 38% (3459/9070) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13913/33551) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 46% (12/14) | Challenger W/L | 45% (53/64) |
| 59% (74/51) | Futures W/L | 59% (316/218) |
| 57% (85/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (365/644) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 45% (20/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/160) |
| 66% (27/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (91/177) |
| 90% (86/77) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (376/325) |
| 10% (86/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (376/51) |
| 14% (65/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (277/42) |
Zink vs. Descotte Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
