Tyler Zink vs Keaton Hance Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L L L
Form
L W W L W LHead-2-Head: Zink 1 - 0 Hance
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zink winning 2 and Hance winning 0. The last match between Zink and Hance was at the M15 Orange Park, 01-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Tyler Zink getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tyler Zink | 1 |
| Keaton Hance | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Orange Park(01-05-2025)
Tyler Zink
Keaton Hance
6
3
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Halys VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Giron VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Tyler Zink
Player
Keaton Hance
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:16:23 | Average Match Time | 1:16:23 |
| 49% (26/53) | 1st Serve % | 65% (28/43) |
| 85% (22/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (17/28) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8/15) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 42% (18/43) | Return Points Win % | 32% (17/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zink vs Hance Match Preview :
When comparing Hance and Zink's recent performances on second serves over the past six months, Hance has demonstrated a slight edge by winning 45.26% of these points, while Zink lags just behind at 44.5%. Since this metric strongly influences predictions, it becomes a crucial point of focus in anticipating match outcomes.
Looking at the return game statistics, Hance has secured 41.79% of points from their opponent's second serves, whereas Zink has managed a slightly better performance with 42.84%. When it comes to first serve returns, Hance has a clear advantage, winning 31.29% of these points compared to Zink's 25.73%. This data provides significant insight into identifying the favored contender in this head-to-head encounter.
In terms of saving breakpoints under pressure, Zink seems to have a modest advantage, having saved 53.37% of instances, compared to Hance's 50%. This aspect is particularly valuable for live in-game betting predictions.
Evaluating the players' match win percentages over the past year, Hance has achieved a 75% success rate (winning 3 out of 4 matches), whereas Zink has won 67.65% of matches (46 out of 68). This overall performance offers a comprehensive view of the projected head-to-head outcome.
Analyzing surface preferences, Hance's best win rate of 60% is on Clay (3 wins, 2 losses), while Zink shows the highest success on indoor hard courts, with a 62% win rate (16 wins, 10 losses). Notably, Zink struggles more on Clay, winning only 52% of matches (22 wins, 20 losses).
Considering player levels, Hance has participated primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10K, with a 75% win rate (3 wins, 1 loss), whereas Zink hails from the same tournament level, boasting a 76.09% win rate (35 wins, 11 losses). A player's potential can often be evaluated by examining the tournament level they've been competing in.
In terms of opponent quality, Hance has competed against players with an average ranking of 116.5 over the past year. In contrast, Zink's average opponent ranking stands at 400.69, indicating the differing quality of their competition.
An examination of deciding set performances reveals that Hance has an impeccable record, winning 100% of deciding sets over the last year, while Zink holds a respectable 77% win rate in such scenarios.
Finally, considering break-point conversion, Zink excels by converting an impressive 27.05% of their opportunities, surpassing Hance's 18.18%. This statistic is vital for gathering insights on in-match betting opportunities when breakpoints arise.
Given the comprehensive analysis, although both players showcase strengths in distinct areas, the slight edge in crucial metrics and consistency offers Hance a favorable outlook to emerge victorious in this upcoming matchup.
Zink vs Hance Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Tyler Zink
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Tyler Zink
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Tyler Zink
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
14
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Oren Vasser
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Keaton Hance Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Keaton Hance
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keaton Hance
Player
Matthew Segura
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Dickerson
Player
Keaton Hance
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
5 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
37
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keaton Hance
Player
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keaton Hance
Player
Evan Bynoe
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (89/69) | Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 54% (192/165) | Sets Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) |
| 52% (1770/1664) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (46/58) |
| 53% (42/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (31/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 62% (16/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 679 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 324 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:15:41 |
| 429.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 123.67 |
| 59% (5759/9803) | 1st Serve % | 69% (190/275) |
| 71% (4063/5759) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (122/190) |
| 50% (2037/4044) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (45/85) |
| 40% (367/928) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (13/27) |
| 38% (3637/9500) | Return Points Win % | 40% (109/272) |
| 45% (13/16) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (76/53) | Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 56% (88/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 46% (21/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (27/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 89% (90/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 11% (90/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 13% (68/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Zink vs. Hance Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
