Tyler Zink vs Flavio Cobolli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zink vs Cobolli analysis and find out who is favored!
Tyler Zink vs Flavio Cobolli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zink has won 44% of points on his second serve, while Cobolli has won 52.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zink, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cobolli has won 49.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.71% and 33.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zink has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cobolli has saved 62.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zink has won 28.57% of matches played (W/L 4/ 10), with Cobolli winning 63.44% (W/L 59/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zink has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 24/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Cobolli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 39/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Zink has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9), where as Cobolli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.78% of matches (W/L 31/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zink has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.57 while Cobolli has played against players with an average rank of 238.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zink has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cobolli has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zink has converted 16.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cobolli has converted 41.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zink 0 - 0 Cobolli
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
874
Rank
781
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
63
Rank
62
High
21
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
44% (33-42)
Career Total W/L
57% (163-121)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (16-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$498,020
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tyler Zink | Flavio Cobolli |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (16/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (36/28) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (305/285) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (14/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.38 |
Aces Total | 0 | 111 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 0 | 70 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:53:38 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 189.75 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 54% (978/1800) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (693/978) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (422/822) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (74/173) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (720/1829) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (10/5) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (14/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 82% (9/11) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 42% (12/5) |
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Learner Tien
Player
Tyler Zink
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
William Grant
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alfredo Perez
Player
Tyler Zink
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Szymon Kielan
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Flavio Cobolli Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Cameron Norrie
Player
Flavio Cobolli
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
48%
(
60 of
124)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Flavio Cobolli
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Constant Lestienne
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Brandon Holt
43%
(
37 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
59%
(
29 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Flavio Cobolli
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marc Polmans
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more