Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tung-Lin Wu vs Daniel Masur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wu vs Masur analysis and find out who is favored!
Tung-Lin Wu vs Daniel Masur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wu has won 52.67% of points on his second serve, while Masur has won 51.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wu, in recent form, has won 50.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Masur has won 52.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.7% and 31.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wu has saved 58.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Masur has saved 61.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wu has won 49.09% of matches played (W/L 27/ 28), with Masur winning 65.71% (W/L 46/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 167/ 125), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Masur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 86/ 65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Wu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/ 19), where as Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 28/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Wu winning 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Wu winning 2 and Masur winning 4. The last match between Wu and Masur was at the Quimper 2 Challenger, 31-01-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with Daniel Masur getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wu and Masur have played a deciding set 2 times, with Wu winning 0 times and Masur 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wu winning 0, and Masur 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wu has played against opponents with an average rank of 294.47 while Masur has played against players with an average rank of 183.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wu has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Masur has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wu has converted 40.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Masur has converted 45.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wu 0 - 2 Masur
257
Rank
158
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
309
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
55% (224-187)
Career Total W/L
58% (380-276)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
82% (28-6)
$106,780
Career Prize Money
$151,200
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 4 |
| Games Won | 26 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 20 | 18 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:13 | 1:49:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (105/170) | 63% (103/163) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (75/105) | 79% (81/103) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (33/65) | 53% (32/60) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (50/163) | 36% (62/170) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Masur
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
12
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
10
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 82% (28/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (18/21) | 77% (61/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (194/192) | 58% (456/324) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 85% (28/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.52 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 199 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:15 | 1:40:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 243.82 | 131.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (812/1240) | 65% (1530/2351) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (540/812) | 78% (1186/1530) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (221/428) | 53% (436/821) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (49/117) | 44% (108/248) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (438/1176) | 40% (987/2483) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 86% (6/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 85% (22/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 82% (28/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 69% (11/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 90% (29/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 10% (29/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 40% (5/2) |
Tung-Lin Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Cash Hanzlik
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Daniel Masur
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
20
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Albano Olivetti
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
7
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
25 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
15 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Niklas Schell
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
16
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Zizou Bergs
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Radu Albot
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Arthur Gea
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wu Vs Masur Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
