Tsung-Hao Huang vs Christian Langmo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L W W L
Form
W W L W W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Huang 0 - 1 Langmo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Huang winning 0 and Langmo winning 2. The last match between Huang and Langmo was at the M25 Burnie, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Christian Langmo getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tsung-Hao Huang | 0 |
| Christian Langmo | 1 |
M25 Burnie(19-02-2025)
6
2
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Osaka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Christian Langmo
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
3
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
4
2
Total Double Faults
0
1:5:53
Average Match Time
1:5:53
72% (52/72)
1st Serve %
83% (30/36)
56% (29/52)
1st Serve Win %
80% (24/30)
25% (5/20)
2nd Serve Win %
67% (4/6)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (5/11)
22% (8/36)
Return Points Win %
53% (38/72)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tsung-Hao Huang vs Christian Langmo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tsung-Hao Huang 0 - 1 Christian Langmo
According to recent form, Huang has displayed a second serve performance with a success rate of 45.24%, whereas Langmo has achieved a higher success rate of 50.1%. It is worth noting that there exists a notable correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Regarding return game statistics in recent form, it is observed that Huang has managed to win 54.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Langmo has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 47.72%. Additionally, Huang has recorded a return success rate of 34.77% for first serves, in contrast to Langmo's 30.26%. These insights hold substantial relevance in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
When analyzing how players handle pressure situations, it is evident that Huang has saved 55.75% of breakpoints in recent encounters, whereas Langmo has showcased an impressive ability to save 68.49%, thus providing valuable statistics for in-game betting predictions.
Considering the overall performance overview, Huang has secured victory in 43.4% of their matches played in the past year, with a win-loss record of 23/30. On the other hand, Langmo has enjoyed greater success, winning 60.53% of their matches (46/30). These figures enable us to form a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head matchup.
Examining the players' performances on different surfaces, it is notable that Huang has recorded their highest career win percentage on Hard courts, achieving a success rate of 55% (145/119). Conversely, their success rate on Indoor Hard courts stands at a lower 20% (1/4). In contrast, Langmo has excelled on Hard courts, boasting a career win percentage of 60% (194/130), while their success rate on Indoor Hard courts is 33% (2/4).
Considering the level of competition, Huang has primarily competed in the Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K, winning 50% of their matches (22/22). Conversely, Langmo has predominantly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K, achieving victory in 54.17% of their matches (26/22). Thus, when evaluating player statistics to predict the favorite, it is imperative to consider the relative event level they have been competing in.
Assessing the quality of opponents faced, we find that over the past 12 months, Huang has confronted players with an average rank of 412.17, whereas Langmo has competed against opponents with an average rank of 395.17.
In terms of performance in deciding sets, Huang has proven their capability by winning 50% of such sets in the last 12 months. Meanwhile, Langmo has exhibited further prowess, attaining victory in 65% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics hold relevance for live predictions and betting, particularly if the match reaches a decisive set.
While utilizing past player performance is valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is also crucial to consider current event statistics for assessing in-form players during an ongoing event. Thus, it is advised to refer to the section below for current event statistics if the players have participated in matches at the present event. Additionally, it is worth noting that certain players may excel at specific events, which should be considered when making outcome predictions.
A significant factor in in-game live betting tips is break point conversion. Recent form reveals that Huang has accomplished a 44.72% success rate in converting break point opportunities, whereas Langmo has displayed a slightly lower conversion rate of 33.73% in breaking their opponents' serves. This statistic provides valuable insights for in-game live betting when players have break point opportunities.
For those intrigued by models that forecast tennis match outcomes, they may find this article a useful starting point. However, it is advised that only statistics enthusiasts venture into this material.
Tsung-Hao Huang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
110)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Yamato Yukawa
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Daiki Yoshimura
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
47 of
60)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Yuta Kikuchi
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Christian Langmo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Christian Langmo
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
72%
(
83 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
61 of
115)
23
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
54 of
61)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
29 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
32 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(4) 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (159/142)
Win/Loss
58% (247/177)
52% (356/334)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (552/426)
50% (3135/3141)
Games Win/Loss
52% (4944/4592)
55% (148/122)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (199/132)
40% (10/15)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (41/39)
17% (1/5)
Indoor Hard W/L
33% (2/4)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
71% (5/2)
0.15
Aces Per Game
0.58
465
Aces Total
2710
0.15
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
471
Total Double Faults
1163
1:19:23
Average Match Time
1:32:20
421.51
Average Opponent Rank
458.04
62% (10260/16519)
1st Serve %
63% (15963/25442)
62% (6391/10260)
1st Serve Win %
74% (11789/15963)
48% (3033/6259)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4750/9479)
47% (812/1719)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (850/2227)
42% (6902/16368)
Return Points Win %
37% (9479/25907)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
32% (6/13)
Challenger W/L
49% (64/66)
55% (153/127)
Futures W/L
62% (183/111)
52% (155/297)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (244/416)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
60% (31/52)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
57% (82/145)
54% (50/92)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (76/135)
86% (157/135)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (233/200)
14% (157/22)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (233/33)
16% (144/23)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
25% (190/47)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
