M. Fucsovics
To Win
T. Schoolkate
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W L LForm
L W W W L W W L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Schoolkate winning 2 and Sakamoto winning 0. The last match between Schoolkate and Sakamoto was at the Gwangju Challenger, 21-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Tristan Schoolkate getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tristan Schoolkate | 1 |
Rei Sakamoto | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(21-04-2025)
Schoolkate | Stats | Sakamoto |
---|---|---|
61% (23-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (13-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
127 | Ranking | 281 |
119 | Highest Rank | 278 |
24 | Age | 18 |
R | Plays | - |
4 | Titles | 1 |
59% (192-136) | Career Total W/L | 51% (45-43) |
$458,850 | Career Prize Money | $23,760 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / Q1 round
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Rei Sakamoto
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
14 | Games Won | 11 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:57:16 | Average Match Time | 1:57:16 |
60% (50/83) | 1st Serve % | 66% (57/87) |
76% (38/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (45/57) |
58% (19/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (12/30) |
20% (2/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
34% (30/87) | Return Points Win % | 31% (26/83) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the last six months, if we delve into the realm of second serve performance, Sakamoto has triumphed in securing 46.51% of his points, eclipsing Schoolkate, who trails slightly with a 45.8% success rate. Can a slim edge like this tilt the scales in Sakamoto's favor for predicting the match outcome? Given the strong predictive potential tied to this statistic, it's a pivotal factor to consider.
Moving to the aspect of returns under pressure, Sakamoto showcases a breakpoint-saving ability of 51.1%, which is commendable, but Schoolkate's prowess shines brighter at 58.39%. This can play a critical role in determining who prevails when the heat is on during nail-biting rallies and makes for intriguing in-game betting insights.
How about the battle when facing an opponent's serve? Sakamoto has seized 44.9% of points when returning second serves, yet Schoolkate edges above him at 46.93%. Interestingly, the numbers shift when returning first serves, with Sakamoto at 22.75% compared to Schoolkate's close 21.94%. Could these return stats illuminate which player holds the upper hand in this specific matchup?
In the grand picture of match outcomes over the past year, Sakamoto has claimed victory in 60% of his contests, trumping Schoolkate's fractionally lower win rate of 58.75%. But is this performance streak enough to make Sakamoto the clear favorite, or do other factors weigh in more heavily?
And what about their proficiency on various court surfaces? Sakamoto's forte lies on hard courts with a 54% win record, yet he falters on indoor hard courts with just 45%. On the other hand, Schoolkate revels in grass courts, boasting a stellar 68% win rate, although he is less assured on clay at 52%. Such surface preferences could hint at tactical advantages in upcoming matches.
Assessing the tournaments they navigate, both players primarily participate in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Sakamoto's success rate stands at 63.64%, while Schoolkate is slightly behind with 62.07%. These stats reveal marginal differences but highlight the importance of evaluating competition level when making predictions.
Within a year's scope, the competition has been evenly matched; both have contended against opponents hovering around an average rank of 241, with Sakamoto at 241.26 and Schoolkate at 241.25. Could this balance suggest a closely contested matchup ahead?
If the tension culminates in a deciding set, Sakamoto's 64% win rate in such encounters positions him favorably against Schoolkate's 56%. This deciding set prowess potentially arms Sakamoto with a psychological edge during clutch moments.
But what of their ability to capitalize on break points? Sakamoto converts 30.43% of his opportunities, ever so slightly outpacing Schoolkate, who achieves a conversion rate of 30.11%. These razor-thin margins make predicting break point scenarios a thrilling endeavor for live betting enthusiasts.
In summary, while both combatants display unique strengths, be it under pressure, on specific surfaces, or in crucial match moments, Sakamoto's slight advantages in second serve performance and deciding set success might just tilt the odds in his favor. Thus, predictions lean towards Sakamoto emerging victorious in this tightly contested showdown.
Schoolkate vs Sakamoto Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jie Cui
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Omar Jasika
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
62%
(
72 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
118)
11
Aces
13
9
Double Faults
4
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
38%
(
44 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
126
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hugo Grenier
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
65%
(
15 of
23)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
8
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
7
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Rei Sakamoto
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Rei Sakamoto
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
11
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexandre Muller
Player
Rei Sakamoto
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Rei Sakamoto
Player
James Duckworth
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
20
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
44 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
15
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jakub Mensik
Player
Rei Sakamoto
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Lucas Miedler
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (192/136) | Win/Loss | 51% (45/43) |
56% (429/337) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (100/100) |
52% (3917/3545) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (921/967) |
59% (132/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (29/26) |
51% (24/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) |
60% (15/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) |
68% (21/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.61 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
2224 | Aces Total | 416 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
1356 | Total Double Faults | 207 |
1:45:33 | Average Match Time | 1:42:27 |
408.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.75 |
60% (13763/22800) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3690/6074) |
74% (10204/13763) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2525/3690) |
48% (4368/9037) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1222/2384) |
40% (862/2178) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (196/500) |
38% (8870/23121) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2160/5864) |
43% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
60% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) |
43% (6/8) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
56% (88/68) | Challenger W/L | 56% (22/17) |
64% (89/50) | Futures W/L | 49% (21/22) |
58% (186/320) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (44/87) |
67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (71/141) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (14/26) |
58% (59/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (14/25) |
90% (172/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (46/37) |
10% (172/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (46/9) |
24% (156/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (42/8) |