M. Fucsovics
To Win
T. Schoolkate
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W L LForm
L W L W L W L L L LThey have played 6 sets in total, with Schoolkate winning 3 and Sultanov winning 3. The last match between Schoolkate and Sultanov was at the Bengaluru Challenger, 25-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Tristan Schoolkate getting the victory 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tristan Schoolkate | 1 |
Khumoun Sultanov | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bengaluru Challenger(25-02-2025)
Schoolkate | Stats | Sultanov |
---|---|---|
61% (23-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (11-13) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
127 | Ranking | 224 |
119 | Highest Rank | 215 |
24 | Age | 26 |
R | Plays | R |
4 | Titles | 9 |
59% (192-136) | Career Total W/L | 62% (302-188) |
$458,850 | Career Prize Money | $72,000 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
109)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
6-3 4-6 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 3 |
31 | Games Won | 31 |
29 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
2:5:50 | Average Match Time | 2:5:50 |
60% (103/172) | 1st Serve % | 57% (105/185) |
77% (79/103) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (78/105) |
51% (35/69) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (35/80) |
58% (7/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (6/11) |
39% (72/185) | Return Points Win % | 34% (58/172) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In assessing the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match between Sultanov and Schoolkate, several performance metrics offer valuable insight. Sultanov has demonstrated remarkable performance on his second serve, securing 52.11% of points over the past six months, while Schoolkate trails slightly with 48.96%. Such statistics are often pivotal in anticipating match outcomes. Furthermore, when returning second serves, Sultanov outperforms with a 52.71% success rate compared to Schoolkate's 50.64%. This trend continues with first serve returns, where Sultanov registers 34.04% against Schoolkate’s 31.1%, metrics that carry a strong correlation to predicting the favored player.
Their ability to handle high-pressure situations, such as critical breakpoints, also reflects Sultanov's edge. He has successfully saved 61.11% of breakpoints in recent months, marginally surpassing Schoolkate’s 60.26% mark. Such performance under duress provides significant clues for in-game betting scenarios. Additionally, Sultanov has an impressive match record over the past year, achieving a win rate of 73.63%, contrasted with Schoolkate’s 58.75% over the same period. This overall record contributes to forming a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Examining surface-specific performance, Sultanov excels on hard courts, boasting a 67% career win rate, whereas Schoolkate’s forte lies on grass with a 68% career win percentage. Though Sultanov shows susceptibility on grass, winning only 50% of his matches, this is less likely to tip the scales in the present encounter. When considering the venues of these players' contests over the past year, Sultanov has predominately competed in Futures and ITF $10K events, winning 80% of matches, while Schoolkate has engaged predominately at the Challenger level, with a 61.9% success rate.
In previous direct encounters, Sultanov has won their sole meeting, defeating Schoolkate in a three-set match at the Pune Challenger. This head-to-head data suggests a marginal advantage in favor of Sultanov, given his past victory and proficient handling of decisive sets, winning 71% of such sets over the past year. Moreover, Sultanov has faced opponents with an average ranking lower than Schoolkate's adversaries, suggesting a slight variance in competition levels.
Finally, analyzing breakpoint conversion as an indicator for potential in-game betting, Sultanov stands superior, converting 44.67% of opportunities, surpassing Schoolkate’s 39.05%. Given these statistics and overall performance comparisons, Sultanov emerges as the probable victor in this match, supported by his stronger recent form and reliable performance in crucial match elements.
Schoolkate vs Sultanov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jie Cui
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Omar Jasika
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
62%
(
72 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
118)
11
Aces
13
9
Double Faults
4
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
38%
(
44 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
126
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hugo Grenier
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
65%
(
15 of
23)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
8
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
7
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hady Habib
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
16
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Raphael Collignon
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Lukas Klein
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Matej Dodig
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Cina
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (192/136) | Win/Loss | 62% (302/188) |
56% (429/337) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (659/448) |
52% (3917/3545) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5580/4734) |
59% (132/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (173/88) |
51% (24/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (87/65) |
60% (15/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (41/34) |
68% (21/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
0.61 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
2224 | Aces Total | 1555 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
1356 | Total Double Faults | 1025 |
1:45:33 | Average Match Time | 1:30:37 |
408.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 489.44 |
60% (13763/22800) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18255/29505) |
74% (10204/13763) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (12361/18255) |
48% (4368/9037) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5753/11251) |
40% (862/2178) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1441/3217) |
38% (8870/23121) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12470/29827) |
43% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) |
60% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 45% (5/6) |
43% (6/8) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
56% (88/68) | Challenger W/L | 48% (67/73) |
64% (89/50) | Futures W/L | 69% (229/105) |
58% (186/320) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (300/486) |
67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
50% (71/141) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (85/148) |
58% (59/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (72/127) |
90% (172/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (289/261) |
10% (172/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (289/28) |
24% (156/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (201/41) |