M. Fucsovics
To Win
T. Schoolkate
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L W L LForm
W W W L W W L L W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Schoolkate winning 2 and Chung winning 0. The last match between Schoolkate and Chung was at the Gwangju Challenger, 25-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Tristan Schoolkate getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tristan Schoolkate | 1 |
Hyeon Chung | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(25-04-2025)
Schoolkate | Stats | Chung |
---|---|---|
61% (23-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 76% (22-7) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
127 | Ranking | 394 |
119 | Highest Rank | 19 |
24 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | R |
4 | Titles | 17 |
59% (192-136) | Career Total W/L | 66% (278-145) |
$458,850 | Career Prize Money | $2,529,406 |
1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:18:12 | Average Match Time | 1:18:12 |
70% (40/57) | 1st Serve % | 58% (30/52) |
65% (26/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
65% (11/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 13% (1/8) |
52% (27/52) | Return Points Win % | 35% (20/57) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In analyzing the performance of Chung and Schoolkate over the past six months, it's crucial to examine their recent form and predict outcomes based on statistical evidence. Chung has demonstrated a win rate of 74.36% in matches played over the last year (W/L 29/10), whereas Schoolkate's win rate stands at 58.75% (W/L 47/33). Looking specifically at second serve performance, Schoolkate has won 45.95% of their second serve points against Chung's 39.09%, suggesting a slight advantage for Schoolkate in this area.
When assessing return game statistics, Schoolkate marginally surpasses Chung by winning 46.73% of their opponent’s second serve points, while Chung has secured 46.33%. Interestingly, Chung leads in first serve returns, winning 29.93% compared to Schoolkate’s 21.94%. This reflects an intriguing balance in their abilities to win return points, potentially indicating who might be favored in this head-to-head match-up.
In pressure situations, such as saving breakpoints, Schoolkate again holds the upper hand, saving 58.3% of breakpoints versus Chung's 46.86%. This ability to save breakpoints could prove significant, especially for in-game betting predictions. Additionally, break point conversion rates show Chung with a slight edge, having converted 35.8% of opportunities compared to Schoolkate's 30.11%.
Examining surface preferences, Chung excels on hard courts, with a career win percentage of 70% (W/L 223/97), while Schoolkate shines on grass, with a win rate of 68% (W/L 21/10). Contrarily, Chung has struggled on grass, and Schoolkate on clay, with career losses outnumbering wins significantly. Thus, surface type plays a crucial role in predicting their performance head-to-head.
Another aspect to consider when predicting the match outcome is the level of competition. Chung has mainly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning an impressive 77.42% of these matches (W/L 24/7). Meanwhile, Schoolkate has faced higher-rated opponents in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 62.07% of their matches (W/L 36/22). Over the past year, Schoolkate’s opponents have had an average rank of 241.54, whereas Chung’s have been 332.49.
If the match extends to a deciding set, Schoolkate appears more robust, having won 56% of such sets compared to Chung’s 44% over the same period. The choice of event and timing might also influence their performances, but based on the extensive analysis, Schoolkate seems slightly favored to win, backed by a consistent edge in relevant statistical metrics.
Schoolkate vs Chung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jie Cui
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Omar Jasika
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
62%
(
72 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
118)
11
Aces
13
9
Double Faults
4
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
38%
(
44 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
126
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hugo Grenier
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
65%
(
15 of
23)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
8
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
7
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Shintaro Imai
Player
Hyeon Chung
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
10
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
42%
(
25 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
51%
(
71 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
114
Total Points Won
112
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Filip Peliwo
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Hyeon Chung
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
James Kent Trotter
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Constant Lestienne
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hyeon Chung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (192/136) | Win/Loss | 66% (278/145) |
56% (429/337) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (635/383) |
52% (3917/3545) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5110/4184) |
59% (132/93) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (224/100) |
51% (24/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (30/21) |
60% (15/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (22/16) |
68% (21/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) |
0.61 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
2224 | Aces Total | 1194 |
0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
1356 | Total Double Faults | 1035 |
1:45:33 | Average Match Time | 1:24:11 |
408.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 521 |
60% (13763/22800) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15127/24205) |
74% (10204/13763) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10645/15127) |
48% (4368/9037) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4595/9078) |
40% (862/2178) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1221/2734) |
38% (8870/23121) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10469/25256) |
43% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 58% (22/16) |
60% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 52% (17/16) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 83% (10/2) |
43% (6/8) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (59/47) |
56% (88/68) | Challenger W/L | 69% (97/43) |
64% (89/50) | Futures W/L | 78% (73/21) |
58% (186/320) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (247/377) |
67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 68% (28/41) |
50% (71/141) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (67/126) |
58% (59/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (69/117) |
90% (172/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (274/239) |
10% (172/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (274/35) |
24% (156/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (149/39) |