Tristan Mccormick vs Niccolo Ciavarella Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do recent second serve performances compare? Mccormick shows a slight advantage, winning 46.35% of points compared to Ciavarella's 40.21%.
• Who has the edge in return games recently? Ciavarella holds a narrow lead in winning points on opponents' second serve with 46.36%, while Mccormick lags slightly at 45.15%.
• For first serve returns, Ciavarella outperforms Mccormick, securing 33.17% of points versus Mccormick's 25.8%.
• Analyzing break point pressure situations, Mccormick has a higher save rate of 60% under pressure, surpassing Ciavarella's 51.59%.
• Reviewing overall performance over the past year, Mccormick has won 55.26% of matches, edging slightly ahead of Ciavarella's 54.39% win rate.
• Examining surface performance, Mccormick excels on Grass with a 67% win rate, whereas Ciavarella performs best on Hard courts with a 64% win rate.
• Both players mostly compete at the $10K ITF level, where Mccormick claims 56% of matches, slightly better than Ciavarella's 54.39% success.
• Discussing opponent quality, Ciavarella faces tougher competition, playing against opponents with an average rank of 309.05 compared to Mccormick's 351.29.
• Deciding set performance is crucial: Mccormick has a distinct advantage, winning 57% of such sets, whereas Ciavarella has managed just 29%.
• Analyzing break point conversion, Ciavarella offers a stronger performance, converting 36.17% of opportunities while Mccormick converts 28.99%.

Editorial Prediction (July 31, 2025, UTC):

The tennis match between Mccormick and Ciavarella presents a closely contested encounter. Looking at the second serve statistics, Mccormick has performed slightly better, which could be a crucial factor in the match's outcome.

However, Ciavarella shows greater prowess in return games, particularly on opponents' first serves, potentially providing an advantage in breaking Mccormick's rhythm.

Under pressure, Mccormick demonstrates more resilience, indicated by a higher breakpoint save rate, which could be pivotal during critical match moments. Additionally, Mccormick’s ability to close tight matches, evident in their deciding set win rate, provides a notable edge.

Considering opponent quality, Ciavarella has faced more challenging competition, which might prepare them better for higher-level play.

Considering all statistical insights, Mccormick appears slightly more likely to emerge victorious, though Ciavarella's ability to mount comebacks cannot be underestimated.