MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Tristan Mccormick vs Blu Baker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Mccormick 0 - 2 Baker

They have played 5 sets in total, with Mccormick winning 1 and Baker winning 4. The last match between Mccormick and Baker was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Blu Baker getting the victory 6-3 6-7(0) 6-3.

M15 Naples(19-02-2025)

47% (7-8)
YTD Win/Loss
64% (9-5)
0
Head-to-Head
2
729
Ranking
837
495
Highest Rank
608
25
Age
23
-
Plays
-
1
Titles
1
57% (110-83)
Career Total W/L
57% (71-53)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
2
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta

15 Mar 2025 / Final

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Aryna Sabalenka

To Win

69.83 %
5.73%

Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp

14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Daniil Medvedev

To Win

64.9 %
2.01%

Mccormick VS Baker H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-7(0) 6-3
cross
Blu Baker
Player
Tristan Mccormick
63% ( 74 of 118)
1st Serve %
61% ( 72 of 119)
3
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
68% ( 50 of 74)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 45 of 72)
50% ( 22 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
25% ( 4 of 16)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
39% ( 46 of 118)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 49 of 119)
121
Total Points Won
116
w/o
6-3 6-4
cross
Blu Baker
Player
Tristan Mccormick
79% ( 50 of 63)
1st Serve %
48% ( 31 of 65)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
58% ( 29 of 50)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 17 of 31)
54% ( 7 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 14 of 34)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
43% ( 27 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 65)
70
Total Points Won
58

Mccormick VS Baker H2H Stats

Tristan Mccormick Mccormick
Stats
Blu Baker Baker
0
H2H Matches
2
1
Sets Won
4
20
Games Won
30
9
Aces (Total)
3
12
Total Double Faults
9
2:22:46
Average Match Time
2:22:46
56% (103/184)
1st Serve %
69% (124/181)
60% (62/103)
1st Serve Win %
64% (79/124)
48% (39/81)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (29/57)
25% (5/20)
Break Points Won % (Total)
37% (10/27)
40% (73/181)
Return Points Win %
45% (83/184)
0% (0/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (2/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Tristan Mccormick vs Blu Baker Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Tristan Mccormick 0 - 2 Blu Baker

  1. Recent Form: Second Serve Performance
    In the past six months, Mccormick has displayed an impressive second serve performance, winning 50.07% of points. On the other hand, Baker's second serve success rate stands at 47.01%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. Return Game Excellence: Recent Form
    Examining the return game statistics in recent form, Mccormick has outshined their opponents by winning 49.88% of their second serve points. Meanwhile, Baker has achieved an even greater success rate of 54.11%. When considering first serve returns, Mccormick's statistics indicate a 29.74% success rate, while Baker impresses with a 42.13% success rate. Undoubtedly, these figures significantly contribute to predicting the favored player in this highly anticipated head-to-head encounter.
  3. Under Pressure Analysis
    Assessing players' ability to handle pressure, Mccormick has proven their resilience by saving 58.65% of breakpoints in recent competitions. Comparatively, Baker has showcased a slightly lower saving rate of 52.5%. This insightful statistic serves as a valuable tool for in-game betting predictions.
  4. Performance Overview
    Mccormick's performance over the past year showcases a success rate of 48.48% in matches played, with a win-loss record of 32-34. Conversely, Baker boasts an impressive win percentage of 66.67%, triumphing in 8 out of 12 matches played. Considering these overall head-to-head statistics provides a comprehensive overview for match predictions.
  5. Mastery of Surfaces
    When observing career surface win percentages, Mccormick has proven themselves adept at conquering Hard courts, attaining a remarkable 58% win rate (42 victories and 31 losses). Conversely, their performance on Clay courts stands at a respectable 57% win rate (48 victories and 36 losses). In contrast, Baker has excelled on Clay, achieving a win percentage of 64% (47 victories and 27 losses), but struggles on Indoor Hard courts, only securing victory in 33% of matches played (1 victory and 2 losses).
  6. Player Level Analysis
    In the past year, Mccormick has primarily participated in the $10K tier of Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments. Impressively, they have secured victory in 47.06% of matches played (24 victories and 27 losses). Conversely, Baker has showcased their skills in the same tournament tier, triumphing in an extraordinary 66.67% of matches (8 victories and 4 losses). It should be noted that when comparing player statistics to predict favorites, their performance is relative to the level of the event they have been competing in.
  7. Head-to-Head Battles
    The two players have crossed paths on one occasion before, with Mccormick failing to secure a victory and Baker emerging triumphant. These encounters encompassed a total of two sets, both resulting in a win for Baker. The most recent match occurred on the Second Hard court of M15 Kingston on January 16, 2025, with Baker emerging victorious without completing the match.
  8. Duration of Head-to-Head Matches
    Reflecting on past head-to-head matches, the average match duration between these competitors has amounted to 1 hour, 35 minutes, and 49 seconds.
  9. Predicting Deciding Set Outcomes
    To analyze the probability of the match going into a decisive set and the subsequent outcome, it is notable that Mccormick and Baker have previously engaged in zero deciding sets. Consequently, no statistical insights can be derived from this particular aspect when predicting the final result.
  10. Extreme Pressure Situations
    During their previous encounters, Mccormick and Baker have not encountered any tiebreak situations. Therefore, no conclusions regarding tiebreak success rates for either player can be drawn.
  11. Opponent Quality Analysis
    Over the course of the last 12 months, Mccormick has faced opponents with an average ranking of 327.7. In contrast, Baker's opposition possessed an average ranking of 235.33. These opponent quality statistics provide further context when evaluating the players' achievements.
  12. Deciding Set Performance
    If the match progresses to a decisive set, Mccormick has demonstrated a 41% success rate in such scenarios over the last 12 months. Conversely, Baker has won 50% of decisive sets in all matches played on the professional tour.
  13. Current Event Performance
    While past player performance proves invaluable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally crucial to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. For an indication of how they fare in the ongoing tournament, refer to the section below. Further, certain players exhibit superior performances at specific events, highlighting the significance of considering such factors when predicting the outcome of this match.
  14. Break Point Conversion
    Recent statistics demonstrate that Mccormick has successfully converted 39.89% of breakpoint opportunities, while Baker boasts a conversion rate of 44.44% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves pivotal when making real-time in-game betting decisions surrounding breakpoint opportunities.
  15. If you are interested in employing models to predict tennis matches, the following article serves as a valuable resource (Warning: Intended for statistically inclined individuals).

Tristan Mccormick Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Kase Schinnerer
Player
Tristan Mccormick
49% ( 50 of 103)
1st Serve %
63% ( 50 of 80)
9
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
6
72% ( 36 of 50)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 37 of 50)
57% ( 30 of 53)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 16 of 30)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
36% ( 37 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 27 of 80)
93
Total Points Won
90
L
6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Lucca Pinto
62% ( 46 of 74)
1st Serve %
63% ( 50 of 80)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
70% ( 32 of 46)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 29 of 50)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
35% ( 26 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 39 of 80)
87
Total Points Won
67
W
4-6 6-2 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Gage Brymer
Player
Tristan Mccormick
67% ( 60 of 90)
1st Serve %
59% ( 60 of 102)
0
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
10
67% ( 40 of 60)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 44 of 60)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 18 of 42)
27% ( 4 of 15)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
37% ( 33 of 90)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 40 of 102)
97
Total Points Won
95
L
6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(2) H2H
R2
cross
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Marco Alvarez
69% ( 61 of 88)
1st Serve %
56% ( 56 of 100)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
66% ( 40 of 61)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 35 of 56)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 18 of 44)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
35% ( 31 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 47 of 100)
104
Total Points Won
84
W
6-2 4-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Patricio Alvarado
65% ( 59 of 91)
1st Serve %
67% ( 62 of 92)
9
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
80% ( 47 of 59)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 40 of 62)
47% ( 15 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
32% ( 29 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 39 of 92)
101
Total Points Won
82
W
6-7(10) 6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Ryan Fishback
Player
Tristan Mccormick
70% ( 38 of 54)
1st Serve %
63% ( 42 of 67)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
76% ( 29 of 38)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 29 of 42)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
28% ( 15 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 28 of 67)
67
Total Points Won
54
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
W
6-4 3-6 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Blu Baker
Player
Tristan Mccormick
63% ( 74 of 118)
1st Serve %
61% ( 72 of 119)
3
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
68% ( 50 of 74)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 45 of 72)
50% ( 22 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
25% ( 4 of 16)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
39% ( 46 of 118)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 49 of 119)
121
Total Points Won
116
L
6-3 6-7(0) 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Garrett Johns
Player
Tristan Mccormick
55% ( 54 of 99)
1st Serve %
63% ( 76 of 121)
14
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
74% ( 40 of 54)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 49 of 76)
58% ( 26 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 21 of 45)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
33% ( 33 of 99)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 51 of 121)
117
Total Points Won
103
L
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) H2H
R1
cross
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Tristan Mccormick
62% ( 62 of 100)
1st Serve %
70% ( 72 of 103)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
61% ( 38 of 62)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 46 of 72)
61% ( 23 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
31% ( 5 of 16)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
39% ( 39 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 45 of 103)
106
Total Points Won
97
L
5-7 6-4 6-3 H2H

Blu Baker Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Felix Corwin
Player
Blu Baker
67% ( 42 of 63)
1st Serve %
60% ( 31 of 52)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81% ( 34 of 42)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 19 of 31)
43% ( 9 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
32% ( 20 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 25 of 52)
68
Total Points Won
47
L
6-1 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Blu Baker
Player
Tristan Mccormick
63% ( 74 of 118)
1st Serve %
61% ( 72 of 119)
3
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
68% ( 50 of 74)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 45 of 72)
50% ( 22 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
25% ( 4 of 16)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
39% ( 46 of 118)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 49 of 119)
121
Total Points Won
116
W
6-3 6-7(0) 6-3 H2H
Q1
L
1-6 7-6(3) 10-8 H2H
R2
cross
Garrett Johns
Player
Blu Baker
53% ( 31 of 58)
1st Serve %
64% ( 39 of 61)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
87% ( 27 of 31)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 20 of 39)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
31% ( 18 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 31 of 61)
71
Total Points Won
48
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Blu Baker
Player
Oren Vasser
69% ( 78 of 113)
1st Serve %
81% ( 73 of 90)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
53% ( 41 of 78)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 34 of 73)
54% ( 19 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
62% ( 8 of 13)
Break Points Won
46% ( 6 of 13)
47% ( 53 of 113)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 47 of 90)
107
Total Points Won
96
W
6-3 5-7 6-2 H2H
QF
L
7-5 3-6 7-5 H2H
R2
W
w/o H2H
R1
cross
Blu Baker
Player
James Wilkinson
56% ( 24 of 43)
1st Serve %
51% ( 30 of 59)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
75% ( 18 of 24)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 14 of 30)
47% ( 9 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
37% ( 16 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 34 of 59)
61
Total Points Won
41
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Blu Baker
Player
Rafael Alfonso De Alba Valdes
73% ( 11 of 15)
1st Serve %
71% ( 10 of 14)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73% ( 8 of 11)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 8 of 10)
25% ( 1 of 4)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
0% ( 0 of 0)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
14
Total Points Won
15
W
7-6(6) 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-0 6-0 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

57% (110/83)
Win/Loss
57% (71/53)
55% (246/199)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (156/119)
52% (2294/2107)
Games Win/Loss
54% (1363/1180)
58% (46/34)
Hard Win/Loss
49% (22/23)
56% (48/37)
Clay Win/Loss
63% (48/28)
57% (16/12)
Indoor Hard W/L
33% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.55
Aces Per Game
0.11
1184
Aces Total
130
0.33
Double Faults Per Game
0.23
717
Total Double Faults
281
1:37:48
Average Match Time
1:14:42
405.74
Average Opponent Rank
390.22
59% (6703/11427)
1st Serve %
64% (3798/5978)
75% (5001/6703)
1st Serve Win %
65% (2450/3798)
50% (2379/4725)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (1066/2180)
38% (399/1039)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (303/683)
37% (4343/11738)
Return Points Win %
42% (2470/5913)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
41% (14/20)
Challenger W/L
33% (5/10)
60% (96/63)
Futures W/L
61% (66/43)
57% (109/190)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (71/122)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
53% (42/80)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
45% (10/22)
58% (36/62)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (15/29)
88% (101/89)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (70/60)
12% (101/12)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (70/9)
23% (92/21)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (54/11)

See recent tennis photos of Mccormick and Baker

Other Predictions

BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells

flag
16 Mar
flag
01:00
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Zadar Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Murcia Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...