Tristan Lamasine vs Raul Brancaccio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W W W W W L
Form
W W W L W W W W W WHead-to-head: Lamasine 1 - 3 Brancaccio
They have played 9 sets in total, with Lamasine winning 3 and Brancaccio winning 6. The last match between Lamasine and Brancaccio was at the Glasgow Challenger, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Raul Brancaccio getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Glasgow Challenger(16-02-2025)
6
2
6
1
61% (11-7)
YTD Win/Loss
72% (13-5)
1
Head-to-Head
3
614
Ranking
432
181
Highest Rank
121
32
Age
27
R
Plays
R
6
Titles
9
54% (438-366)
Career Total W/L
58% (357-256)
$160,780
Career Prize Money
$119,520
1
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
1
1
Indoor H2H
2
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Cocciaretto PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Lamasine VS Brancaccio H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Tristan Lamasine
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Raul Brancaccio
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Lamasine VS Brancaccio H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
3
3
Sets Won
6
34
Games Won
47
18
Aces (Total)
8
11
Total Double Faults
10
1:28:24
Average Match Time
1:28:24
62% (176/282)
1st Serve %
62% (152/247)
66% (116/176)
1st Serve Win %
74% (112/152)
39% (41/106)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (48/95)
38% (8/21)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (15/34)
35% (87/247)
Return Points Win %
44% (125/282)
25% (1/4)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
75% (3/4)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (2/2)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (2/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
50% (2/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tristan Lamasine vs Raul Brancaccio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tristan Lamasine 1 - 3 Raul Brancaccio
Prediction Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
- Recent Performance of Second Serve: In the past six months, Lamasine has exhibited a second serve winning rate of 45.02%, whereas Brancaccio has achieved a slightly higher percentage of 47.49%. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Analyzing recent return game statistics, Lamasine has been successful in winning 50.35% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Brancaccio has surpassed this performance with a 52.74% success rate. Moreover, first serve return statistics indicate that Lamasine demonstrates a 29.08% success rate, while Brancaccio showcases a superior 35.12% rate. This data strongly influences the favorability prediction in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Examining their ability to handle pressure situations, Lamasine has managed to save 42.45% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Brancaccio has impressively saved 55.73%. This insightful statistic proves to be valuable for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Considering the overall performance over the past year, Lamasine has won 36% of the matches played (18 wins and 32 losses), whereas Brancaccio has achieved a higher success rate with 54.39% (31 wins and 26 losses). This gives us an extensive overview of the head-to-head prediction.
- Optimal Playing Surface: Lamasine has demonstrated their highest career win percentage on hard courts, with 58% success (88 wins and 64 losses). On the other hand, their performance on clay courts has been less favorable, with a win percentage of 52% (176 wins and 165 losses). Similarly, Brancaccio exhibits their best career win percentage on hard courts, attaining a rate of 60% (57 wins and 38 losses), whereas grass courts prove to be their less ideal surface with a win percentage of 33% (1 win and 2 losses).
- Player Level: In the previous year, Lamasine has mostly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize money of over $10,000, winning 36.36% of matches (16 wins and 28 losses). Conversely, Brancaccio has predominantly competed in the same level of tournaments, winning 52.5% of matches (21 wins and 19 losses). When comparing these statistics to predict the favored player, it is important to consider the level of the event they have been playing at.
- Head-to-Head Matches: Their past encounters amount to three matches, with Lamasine emerging victorious once, while Brancaccio has secured triumph twice. Throughout these matches, a total of seven sets have been played, with Lamasine winning three and Brancaccio triumphing in four sets. The most recent meeting between Lamasine and Brancaccio took place at the Nottingham Challenger on July 1, 2025. It was played on an indoor hard court surface, and ultimately, Raul Brancaccio emerged victorious with a score of 6-4, 6-2.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Historically, the average match time between these two players has been recorded at 1 hour, 32 minutes, and 9 seconds during past head-to-head matches.
- Predicting Deciding Sets: Lamasine and Brancaccio have encountered a deciding set on one occasion, whereby Lamasine failed to claim victory while Brancaccio managed to win. This information proves valuable for predicting the outcome should the match extend to a third set.
- Intense Head-to-Head Pressure Moments: Fortunately, there have been no tiebreaks played between Lamasine and Brancaccio in their previous matches.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the last 12 months, Lamasine has competed against opponents with an average ranking of 328.84, whereas Brancaccio has faced players with an average ranking of 374.53.
- Deciding Set Performance against All Opponents: In matches requiring a deciding set over the past year, Lamasine has claimed victory in 33% of the occasions, while Brancaccio has emerged triumphant in 47% of all matches played on tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performances hold significance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to identify in-form players. For an indication of the current event's player performance, please refer to the section below. Additionally, certain players may exhibit enhanced performance at specific events, signifying the importance of factoring this variable into outcome predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Lamasine has successfully converted 39.39% of breakpoint opportunities, while Brancaccio has demonstrated a slightly higher conversion rate of 40.78% when given the chance to break their opponent's serve. This statistic is particularly significant for live in-game betting tips whenever either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models and theories that effectively predict tennis matches, I highly recommend reading this article (Please be advised, this article is primarily for statistical enthusiasts).
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Tristan Lamasine
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Leo Raquillet
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Maxence Bertimon
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Hamish Stewart
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 6-7(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Loann Massard
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Martin Sabas
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Leo Lagarrigue
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
77%
(
24 of
31)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
36
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Tristan Lamasine
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Raul Brancaccio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Facundo Juarez
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | w/o | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Oliver Crawford
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Alex Martinez
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Diego Fernandez Flores
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Raul Brancaccio
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Finn Bass
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
67 of
120)
11
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
54% (438/366)
Win/Loss
58% (357/256)
53% (981/873)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (804/599)
51% (9042/8622)
Games Win/Loss
54% (6855/5947)
58% (88/64)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (61/38)
52% (176/165)
Clay Win/Loss
59% (267/182)
56% (170/134)
Indoor Hard W/L
45% (28/34)
57% (4/3)
Grass Win/Loss
33% (1/2)
0.24
Aces Per Game
0.15
2110
Aces Total
955
0.19
Double Faults Per Game
0.28
1630
Total Double Faults
1733
1:16:8
Average Match Time
1:23:33
516.02
Average Opponent Rank
241.62
64% (28159/44135)
1st Serve %
62% (22517/36226)
68% (19091/28159)
1st Serve Win %
65% (14739/22517)
50% (8047/15976)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (6582/13709)
42% (1722/4101)
Break Points Won % (Total)
46% (1933/4228)
39% (17161/43751)
Return Points Win %
43% (16101/37139)
38% (9/15)
Slam W/L
40% (4/6)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
25% (1/3)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
39% (13/20)
Main Tour W/L
31% (4/9)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
51% (245/233)
Challenger W/L
52% (134/124)
64% (171/97)
Futures W/L
65% (214/114)
54% (424/785)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (349/602)
50% (3/6)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
40% (2/5)
56% (145/259)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (83/150)
54% (137/252)
Deciding Set Win %
48% (85/178)
85% (419/357)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (355/312)
15% (419/62)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (355/42)
21% (385/79)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (258/44)
See recent tennis photos of Lamasine and Brancaccio
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
