Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tristan Lamasine vs Elmar Ejupovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamasine vs Ejupovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Tristan Lamasine vs Elmar Ejupovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamasine has won 49.27% of points on his second serve, while Ejupovic has won 51.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamasine, in recent form, has won 51.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ejupovic has won 47.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.74% and 22.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamasine has saved 55.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ejupovic has saved 69.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamasine has won 68.24% of matches played (W/L 58/ 27), with Ejupovic winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamasine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 173/ 153). Ejupovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 172/ 137), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamasine has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 18), where as Ejupovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamasine winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamasine winning 2 and Ejupovic winning 0. The last match between Lamasine and Ejupovic was at the Lyon Challenger, 09-06-2018, Q1 round, Clay with Tristan Lamasine getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamasine and Ejupovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lamasine winning 0 times and Ejupovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamasine winning 0, and Ejupovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamasine has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.94 while Ejupovic has played against players with an average rank of 216.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamasine has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ejupovic has won 21% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamasine has converted 45.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ejupovic has converted 33.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lamasine 1 - 0 Ejupovic
285
Rank
181
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
549
Rank
273
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
55% (420-339)
Career Total W/L
57% (355-268)
58% (19-14)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$160,780
Career Prize Money
$5,215
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tristan Lamasine | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:10 | 1:23:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (21/45) | 56% (37/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (17/21) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (18/24) | 38% (11/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (31/66) | 22% (10/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tristan Lamasine | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (19/14) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (41/35) | 48% (20/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (385/368) | 49% (207/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (17/9) | 30% (3/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 122 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 92 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:58 | 1:46:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 221.21 | 314.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1482/2377) | 62% (820/1319) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1027/1482) | 73% (602/820) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (441/895) | 50% (250/499) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (97/215) | 37% (34/92) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (963/2425) | 34% (432/1285) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (19/14) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (18/32) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 0% (8/0) |
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Tristan Lamasine
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Arthur Weber
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tristan Lamasine
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jiri Vesely
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Antoine Escoffier
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Lucas Poullain
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Elmar Ejupovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Andres Delgadillo
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Diego Bustamante
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
72 of
126)
11
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
10
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Ryan Seggerman
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
37 of
43)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
9 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
30 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamasine Vs Ejupovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
