Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tricia Mar vs Yasmine Wagner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mar vs Wagner analysis and find out who is favored!
Tricia Mar vs Yasmine Wagner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wagner has won 40.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wagner has won 54.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wagner has saved 47.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mar has won 14.29% of matches played (W/L 1/ 6), with Wagner winning 40% (W/L 10/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mar has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 32% (W/L 18/ 38). Wagner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 20/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Mar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Wagner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 38.1% of matches (W/L 8/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mar has played against opponents with an average rank of 87.14 while Wagner has played against players with an average rank of 51.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mar has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wagner has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wagner has converted 52.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mar 0 - 0 Wagner
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
34% (26-51)
Career Total W/L
35% (23-43)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tricia Mar | Yasmine Wagner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 36% (4/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/12) | 46% (42/50) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 610 | 128.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (58/100) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (29/58) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (15/42) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (39/99) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Tricia Mar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Nikol Rivkin
Player
Tricia Mar
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(6) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gina Kondos
Player
Tricia Mar
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anya Chavez
Player
Tricia Mar
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
53 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(5) 6-1 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Yasmine Wagner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mingge Xu
Player
Yasmine Wagner
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tess Sugnaux
Player
Yasmine Wagner
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 0-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorena Schaedel
Player
Yasmine Wagner
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasmine Wagner
Player
Anastasija Radojevic
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Teja Tirunelveli
Player
Yasmine Wagner
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmine Wagner
Player
Elizaveta Koklina
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Mar Vs Wagner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
