Trey Hilderbrand vs Naoki Tajima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hilderbrand vs Tajima analysis and find out who is favored!
Trey Hilderbrand vs Naoki Tajima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hilderbrand has won 51.96% of points on his second serve, while Tajima has won 50.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hilderbrand, in recent form, has won 47.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tajima has won 47.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.42% and 37.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hilderbrand has saved 61.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tajima has saved 59.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hilderbrand has won 61.36% of matches played (W/L 27/ 17), with Tajima winning 53.45% (W/L 31/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hilderbrand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 42/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Hilderbrand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15), where as Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 30/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hilderbrand has played against opponents with an average rank of 102.52 while Tajima has played against players with an average rank of 111.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hilderbrand has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tajima has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hilderbrand has converted 37.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tajima has converted 52.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hilderbrand 0 - 0 Tajima
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
60% (68-45)
Career Total W/L
48% (114-123)
69% (11-5)
YTD W/L
56% (10-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hilderbrand VS Tajima H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Trey Hilderbrand | Naoki Tajima |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 69% (11/5) | 56% (10/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (23/13) | 56% (24/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (192/164) | 55% (215/175) |
Hard Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 60% (9/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Aces pg | 0.52 | 0.32 |
Aces Total | 90 | 61 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 51 | 53 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:52 | 1:28:15 |
Avg Opp Rank | 148.69 | 113.61 |
1st Serve % | 64% (547/851) | 57% (561/979) |
1st Serve W% | 74% (404/547) | 71% (401/561) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (158/304) | 48% (201/418) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (29/71) | 49% (54/111) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (323/897) | 44% (446/1024) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 71% (10/4) | 63% (10/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (11/16) | 56% (9/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 82% (11/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 18% (11/2) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Trey Hilderbrand Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Pranav Kumar
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
22
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
1
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
51 of
63)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
21 of
83)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Andres Urrea
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
13
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Lucca C Pignaton
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
8
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Lucas Nunez
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
13
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H |
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jesse Delaney
Player
Naoki Tajima
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sam Oster
Player
Naoki Tajima
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Makoto Ochi
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoki Tajima
Player
Luke Sorensen
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 5-7 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Naoki Tajima
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Naoki Tajima
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
45%
(
36 of
80)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Sandro Kopp
Player
Naoki Tajima
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more