Trey Hilderbrand vs Kyle Kang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L W W L
Form
W L W W W W W W W LHead To Head: Hilderbrand 1 - 0 Kang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Hilderbrand winning 2 and Kang winning 1. The last match between Hilderbrand and Kang was at the Fairfield Challenger, 07-10-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Trey Hilderbrand getting the victory 6-7(9) 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trey Hilderbrand | 1 |
| Kyle Kang | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Fairfield Challenger(07-10-2024)
Trey Hilderbrand
Kyle Kang
6
7
6
4
6
4
| Hilderbrand | Stats | Kang |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (12-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 76% (13-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 711 | Ranking | 682 |
| 620 | Highest Rank | 591 |
| 25 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 59% (96-68) | Career Total W/L | 57% (74-55) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lajal VS Lemaitre PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shevchenko VS Wawrinka PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
13 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hilderbrand VS Kang H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Kyle Kang
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
50%
(
60 of
121)
13
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
37 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
Hilderbrand VS Kang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:36:37 | Average Match Time | 2:36:37 |
| 55% (65/118) | 1st Serve % | 50% (60/121) |
| 77% (50/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (43/60) |
| 58% (31/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 36% (43/121) | Return Points Win % | 31% (37/118) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Trey Hilderbrand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
12
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Matt Kuhar
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Boris Kozlov
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
96%
(
27 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yi Zhou
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Braden Shick
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
27
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
114)
106
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Nicolas Kicker
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
35
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Brunkow
Player
Kyle Kang
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Evan Bynoe
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Aadarsh Tripathi
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
47%
(
45 of
95)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dane Sweeny
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dominique Rolland
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Hudson Rivera
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Emon Van Loben Sels
55%
(
73 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
92 of
145)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
60 of
92)
53%
(
31 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
55 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
61 of
145)
138
Total Points Won
139
|
6-7(6) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (96/68) | Win/Loss | 57% (74/55) |
| 58% (220/161) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (165/134) |
| 53% (1906/1693) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1486/1391) |
| 60% (54/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (53/37) |
| 58% (32/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (21/13) |
| 50% (8/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 795 | Aces Total | 298 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 510 | Total Double Faults | 238 |
| 1:5:42 | Average Match Time | 1:41:10 |
| 331.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.43 |
| 61% (4454/7297) | 1st Serve % | 59% (4843/8218) |
| 73% (3230/4454) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3228/4843) |
| 47% (1334/2843) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1729/3375) |
| 40% (274/678) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (362/857) |
| 37% (2743/7319) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3383/8266) |
| 54% (26/22) | Challenger W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 60% (70/46) | Futures W/L | 60% (70/46) |
| 59% (96/163) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (71/125) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 58% (22/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (19/38) |
| 48% (26/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 86% (98/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (66/58) |
| 14% (98/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (66/8) |
| 18% (66/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (63/16) |
Hilderbrand vs. Kang Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
