Trevor Svajda vs Kyle Kang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W W W W W W W LH2H: Svajda 1 - 0 Kang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Svajda winning 2 and Kang winning 1. The last match between Svajda and Kang was at the M15 San Diego, 12-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Trevor Svajda getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trevor Svajda | 1 |
| Kyle Kang | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 San Diego(12-06-2025)
Trevor Svajda
Kyle Kang
6
2
3
6
6
0
| Svajda | Stats | Kang |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (18-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 76% (13-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 673 | Ranking | 682 |
| 591 | Highest Rank | 591 |
| 19 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 63% (40-23) | Career Total W/L | 57% (74-55) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hanfmann VS Hemery PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
12 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Trevor Svajda
Player
Kyle Kang
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
64)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:7:55 | Average Match Time | 2:7:55 |
| 58% (38/66) | 1st Serve % | 41% (26/64) |
| 66% (25/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (18/26) |
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (13/38) |
| 100% (6/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 52% (33/64) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Svajda vs Kang Match Preview :
- Second Serve: Svajda outperforms Kang on second serve points, winning 44.9% compared to Kang's 40% over the last six months. Is this a significant advantage? Yes, it can influence the match outcome substantially.
- Return Game: Both players have similar success on their opponent's second serve returns, with Svajda at 47.68% and Kang at 47.06%. For first serve returns, Svajda edges Kang slightly, 28.03% to 27.59%.
- Under Pressure: Svajda saves 58.62% of breakpoints faced, while Kang manages a lower 50%. Could this define who redeems more crucial points in tight situations?
- Overall Record: Over the past year, Kang has shown a better win rate (62.07%) compared to Svajda's 55% in matches played, suggesting a slight edge.
- Surface Proficiency: Svajda excels on hard courts with a 61% career win rate, whereas Kang is more successful on clay at 62%. How important is the playing surface? It can greatly affect player performance.
- Match Level: Svajda has a 70% win rate on Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, while Kang has a 64% success rate at the same level. This reflects competitive experience at similar levels.
- Opponent Quality: Svajda has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (266.4) than Kang (420.07), indicating possibly greater challenge strength.
- Deciding Sets: If the match goes to a deciding set, Kang has a notable advantage, winning 55% of such sets, while Svajda has struggled, winning none in the past year.
- Break Point Conversion: Kang converts break point opportunities at 40%, superior to Svajda’s 27.14%, a crucial factor in clinching games.
Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):
Svajda has shown a strong edge in second serve performance, providing him an asset when under service pressure. His ability to save breakpoints further supports his resilience during critical moments.
Kang, however, excels when converting breakpoints and winning deciding sets, indicating he can sustain and close matches when they become tightly contested. Though Svajda has faced tougher competition, Kang’s overall match win percentage and break point efficiency seem to counterbalance the higher-level exposure Svajda experienced.
Considering these aspects, coupled with Kang’s ability to excel under deciding set conditions, it appears that completing critical points could lean the upcoming match in Kang's favor, barring any major shifts in the current form.
Svajda vs Kang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Trevor Svajda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Trevor Svajda
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-0 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Sekou Bangoura
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Lucas Brown
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Spencer Johnson
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Karue Sell
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Dane Sweeny
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Alfredo Perez
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Miles Jones
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Brunkow
Player
Kyle Kang
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Evan Bynoe
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Aadarsh Tripathi
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
47%
(
45 of
95)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dane Sweeny
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Dominique Rolland
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Hudson Rivera
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Emon Van Loben Sels
55%
(
73 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
92 of
145)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
60 of
92)
53%
(
31 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
55 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
61 of
145)
138
Total Points Won
139
|
6-7(6) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (40/23) | Win/Loss | 57% (74/55) |
| 61% (83/53) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (165/134) |
| 55% (686/571) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1486/1391) |
| 67% (37/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (53/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (21/13) |
| 38% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 154 | Aces Total | 298 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 108 | Total Double Faults | 238 |
| 1:25:53 | Average Match Time | 1:41:10 |
| 370.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.43 |
| 59% (2153/3675) | 1st Serve % | 59% (4843/8218) |
| 68% (1464/2153) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3228/4843) |
| 52% (784/1522) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1729/3375) |
| 44% (181/407) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (362/857) |
| 43% (1546/3618) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3383/8266) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (8/8) | Challenger W/L | 31% (4/9) |
| 74% (32/11) | Futures W/L | 60% (70/46) |
| 62% (37/60) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (71/125) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (7/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (19/38) |
| 50% (7/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 94% (36/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (66/58) |
| 6% (36/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (66/8) |
| 15% (26/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (63/16) |
Svajda vs. Kang Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
