Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Toshihide Matsui vs Maciek Sykut Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matsui vs Sykut analysis and find out who is favored!
Toshihide Matsui vs Maciek Sykut Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matsui has won 50.7% of points on his second serve, while Sykut has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matsui, in recent form, has won 46.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sykut has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.51% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matsui has saved 33.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sykut has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matsui has won 20% of matches played (W/L 1/ 4), with Sykut winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matsui has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 349/ 296), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 5/ 14). Sykut has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 37/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 23/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Matsui has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3), where as Sykut has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matsui winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Matsui winning 2 and Sykut winning 0. The last match between Matsui and Sykut was at the Lexington Challenger, 21-07-2012, Q1 round, Hard with Toshihide Matsui getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:34.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Matsui and Sykut have played a deciding set 0 times, with Matsui winning 0 times and Sykut 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Matsui winning 2, and Sykut 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matsui has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Sykut has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matsui has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sykut has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matsui has converted 36.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sykut has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Matsui 1 - 0 Sykut
881
Rank
261
High
46
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
53% (414-371)
Career Total W/L
43% (62-83)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$23,555
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Toshihide Matsui | Maciek Sykut |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:29:34 | 2:29:34 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (53/96) | 63% (58/92) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (42/53) | 78% (45/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (20/43) | 38% (13/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (34/92) | 35% (34/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Maciek Sykut
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
4
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Toshihide Matsui | Maciek Sykut |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (23/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (97/168) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (66/97) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (36/71) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (54/161) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Toshihide Matsui Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kazuki Nishiwaki
Player
Toshihide Matsui
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Toshihide Matsui
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Qian Sun
Player
Toshihide Matsui
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
47%
(
48 of
102)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
13
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(3) 6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Jiayang Dong
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Toshihide Matsui
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Toshihide Matsui
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Toshihide Matsui
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Toshihide Matsui
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Maciek Sykut Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Maciek Sykut
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
4
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Baker
Player
Maciek Sykut
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Carter
Player
Maciek Sykut
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maciek Sykut
Player
Shaun Bernstein
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Maciek Sykut
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maciek Sykut
Player
Felipe Mantilla
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
Player
Maciek Sykut
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Matsui Vs Sykut Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
